This is an old revision of this page, as edited by OpalYosutebito (talk | contribs) at 18:23, 28 October 2024 (Assessment: banner shell (Rater)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:23, 28 October 2024 by OpalYosutebito (talk | contribs) (Assessment: banner shell (Rater))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. |
User:Champion, you have added the tag to this film that it is a fans point of view and not a neutral point of view, can you let me know which part of the article looks like that?--Ravichandra (talk) 02:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- I believe that the plot section is difficult to comprehend. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- User:Champion, If it is difficult to comprehend, do you think we should mark it as not a neutral point of view? Neutral point of view indicates that the article is not biased and does not use any eulogizing or Wiesel words. Tell me which part of it is difficult to comprehend.--Ravichandra (talk) 02:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- I say the whole section, I'll fix the tags. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- I can't understand why this simple story is difficult to understand. Sorry but I can't agree with you. --Ravichandra (talk) 03:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- I say the whole section, I'll fix the tags. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- User:Champion, If it is difficult to comprehend, do you think we should mark it as not a neutral point of view? Neutral point of view indicates that the article is not biased and does not use any eulogizing or Wiesel words. Tell me which part of it is difficult to comprehend.--Ravichandra (talk) 02:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)