This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pepperbeast (talk | contribs) at 16:38, 28 November 2024 (→ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:38, 28 November 2024 by Pepperbeast (talk | contribs) (→ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Name articles
Variations of names are a legitimate addition to articles about the history and usage of said names. Most of the variants are included in name dictionaries. i am reverting your deletions and suggest you discuss it on the talk pages before restoring your deletions. Your edits are disputed. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 03:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Shia islam: Terminology
I don't believe your recent edit on shia Islam, is constructive. Terminology section is part of the body and should act as a semi full overview. Your edit diminished insight and visibility of the subject. I want to revert it and I'll edit it for clarity if you think it needs more work.
reaching out because I'm watching the page. Bro The Man (talk) 16:01, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- This discussion belongs over at Talk:Shia. PepperBeast (talk) 16:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- i realised i missread the edits you made. They are constructive. thank you. Bro The Man (talk) 04:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Dutch exonyms
I think this was kept but consensus seems to have changed. Do you want to nominate this again? Bearian (talk) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)