This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Z1720 (talk | contribs) at 16:42, 1 December 2024 (→Good article reassessment for Cluj-Napoca: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 16:42, 1 December 2024 by Z1720 (talk | contribs) (→Good article reassessment for Cluj-Napoca: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Shortcuts
 | Combined search for Romania noticeboard and WikiProject archives Discussion of Romania-related topics has been split between this page and WP:RWNB plus its talk page. This box searches the archives of all those pages. | |
 | Merged noticeboard archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. Noticeboard talk archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. WikiProject talk page archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. |
Requested move at Talk:Dobrujan Tatar dialect#Requested move 14 February 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Dobrujan Tatar dialect#Requested move 14 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. asilvering (talk) 19:47, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Michael the Brave
Michael the Brave has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Golubac Fortress
Golubac Fortress has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 17:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Standarization of ș vs s , ț vs t etc.
I propose we standardize the use of ș or s on english wikipedia.
For example Valery Oisteanu VS Andrei Oișteanu (these 2 are brothers). Both are the english versions of the article, and yet they use different versions of ș. I believe, although i'd prefer using "ș", we should use "s" considering that "ș" doesnt exist in the english alphabet. Either that, or use "sh". However doing that would also start the argument of using "uh" for "ă". I can understand standardizing it to ș too, since that is usually whats on the person's birth certificate, in Valery's and Andrei's case, even though "ș" doesnt exist in English. Although this is about the use of "ș" vs "s", realistically there proabably are instances of using a instead of ă or â, or the opposite, and most definently of t instead of ț, or vice versa. John the man the plan on the train track (talk) 10:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Developing Countries WikiContest
Starting this July, we will see a new contest on the scene - the Developing Countries WikiContest (WP:DCWC)! Think of it as a WikiCup but only for articles and media on developing countries.
Competitors may submit GAs, GTs, FAs, FTs, FLs, FPs, and DYK and ITN entries from/on developing countries to gain points and climb the leaderboard. Points are also awarded to those who review GAs, FAs and FLs.
Romania is listed as a developing country for the purposes of this contest and articles related to it are eligible to be submitted for points, so I encourage everyone here to sign up and compete with editors from around the world to create high-quality content!
Append your name to the DCWC signup page today!
Best wishes, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (/my edits) 07:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
MfD nomination at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Moldovan userbox templates
"Moldovan" userboxes have been nominated for deletion. ISO 639 code for Moldovan, mo, has been deprecated. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Moldovan userbox templates. Lucjim (talk) 01:30, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Dodola and Perperuna#Requested move 22 August 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Dodola and Perperuna#Requested move 22 August 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 21:14, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Liviu Librescu
Liviu Librescu has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 07:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Women in Green's October 2024 edit-a-thon
Hello WikiProject Romania:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2024!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk) 12:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Good article reassessment for History of the flags of Romania
History of the flags of Romania has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:20, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Cluj-Napoca
Cluj-Napoca has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:42, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: