Misplaced Pages

Talk:Girls Aloud

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Entranced98 (talk | contribs) at 12:44, 5 December 2024 (Reverted edit by 2A00:CA0:2028:5758:FD8A:7ED5:510A:16FB (talk) to last version by Left guide). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 12:44, 5 December 2024 by Entranced98 (talk | contribs) (Reverted edit by 2A00:CA0:2028:5758:FD8A:7ED5:510A:16FB (talk) to last version by Left guide)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Girls Aloud article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography: Musicians
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconUnited Kingdom Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPop music Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
WikiProject iconCheryl (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheryl, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CherylWikipedia:WikiProject CherylTemplate:WikiProject CherylCheryl
WikiProject iconWomen in Music Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Polish chart peaks?

Where from they come, pOland doesn't have any singles chart, only radio charts, airplay charts and TV charts that doesn't coun tthe low sales of singles, just SMS votes.

Which Girl Aloud?

Help identify these members of Girls Aloud please. First off the easy ones I got, the ginger one and the blonde one:

and the ones I don't, one brunette, two highlighted "blondes", and they all look the same. Take your pic from Cheryl Tweedy, Nadine Coyle and Kimberley Walsh

  • Girl Aloud 1 Girl Aloud 1
  • Girl Aloud 2 Girl Aloud 2
  • Girl Aloud 3 Girl Aloud 3

(all images are on the commons, so could you note the results there please.). I think I must be showing my age. Cheers. Dunc| 00:51, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

1 is Cheryl (or Ashley Cole's bit of fluff)
2 is Kimberley
3 is a really bad picture of Nadine, seemingly sans makeup.
I've answered here as well, in case I've not put the name in the right place on the commons (as I never use it). And the ginger one is the best. Proto t c 10:41, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
Actually I'm pretty sure you've got 1 and 3 the wrong way round. Will you take another looks please. Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 20:58, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
Compare with their pictures on their CBBC profile - I'm pretty sure they're the right way round. Proto t c 08:40, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
Afraid you are wrong. 1=Nadine (roundish face), 2=Cheryl (eyes), 3=Kimberley (dark hair). If you need a source then: PTSE 16:41, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

ANSWER

  • Nadine Coyle Nadine Coyle
  • Cheryl Tweedy Cheryl Tweedy
  • Kimberley Walsh Kimberley Walsh

English-Northern Irish

Girls Aloud are listed as "a English-Irish pop girl group" however Nadine Coyle is from Derry in Northern Ireland. They are officially recognised as independent, separate, countries and so for the sake of accuracy it should probably be English-Northern Irish 82.8.194.226 (talk) 01:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

She self-ID's as Irish so there is nothing to really discuss here. She would also be free to choose ROI nationality if she so wished. SinoDevonian (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 October 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

To be posted under subheading ‘2021-present’:

In September 2023, the remaining members of Girls Aloud registered a new company at Companies House under the name “Let's Go Eskimo Productions LLP”, in reference to the group’s highly successful single “Love Machine”, with their own personal companies listed as officers with significant control. This was reported the following month by many British news outlets which sparked speculation over a potential Girls Aloud reunion despite members previously ruling out a reunion. Goldyshark2 (talk) 14:22, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:12, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Apologises, I forgot to add sources when originally writing the suggested paragraph for addition.
To be posted under subheading ‘2021-present’:
In September 2023, the remaining members of Girls Aloud registered a new company at Companies House under the name “Let's Go Eskimo Productions LLP”, in reference to the group’s highly successful single “Love Machine”, with their own personal companies listed as officers with significant control . This was reported the following month by many British news outlets which sparked speculation over a potential Girls Aloud reunion despite members previously ruling out a reunion .

Goldyshark2 (talk) 20:19, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. All three of the provided sources are tabloids, which are generally not considered reliable sources. Two of them are specifically listed in the Perennial Sources table, one as unacceptable and the other as no consensus for its acceptability (WP:THESUN and WP:DAILYMIRROR). -- Pinchme123 (talk) 03:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
I understand that the sources I provided weren’t reliable and there aren’t any other outlets speculating a reunion so I have removed this. Surely adding information about the remaining members forming “Let's Go Eskimo Productions LLP” would still be acceptable as the source (Companies House) is an official registrar of UK companies and is an official UK government agency? Also, I believe that the company formation is relevant to the group’s page as even if no touring or production efforts have been completed yet under it, it still relates to all of the living members of the group and shows current commercial efforts relating to the group.
To be posted under subheading ‘2021-present’:
In September 2023, the remaining members of Girls Aloud registered a new company at Companies House under the name “Let's Go Eskimo Productions LLP”, in reference to the group’s highly successful single “Love Machine”, with their own personal companies listed as officers with significant control . Goldyshark2 (talk) 14:04, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 Not done: The source provided is considered a primary source, which limits its utility on Misplaced Pages. In this case, using it to support your suggested new sentence would run afoul of our policies against original research, in addition to not supporting most of the sentence. The source doesn't say anything about why the company in question has this name (or if the song it is purportedly named after is successful), it doesn't say anything about who owns the companies that are listed as officers, etc. The original research is in your analysis of the companies, making the determination that the band members are the ones who started this company because they own the companies that are the officers of this company.
Basically, please provide a reliable secondary source, where the author has done the determining about the facts and presents the conclusion that you are trying to include here.
-- Pinchme123 (talk) 15:14, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for your feedback, other than tabloid sources, there aren’t any other secondary sources that haven’t come to the same conclusion that I’m trying to include and so I’m happy to leave it as it is unless other reliable sources report on it in the future. As you can probably tell, I’m quite new to editing on Misplaced Pages and so I’m deeply grateful for your help! Goldyshark2 (talk) 23:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 May 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

British and Irish band 81.99.75.83 (talk) 20:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 20:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 July 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the "members" section under Sarah Harding, change "since 2023" to "died 2021" or "deceased", because the wording for "since 2023" doesn't make sense because Harding died in 2021 and remaining members of Girls Aloud announced their reunion in 2023, unless if they consider her as an "Eternal Member", which might be a violation of MOS:EUPHEMISM. 2603:6081:893D:13AC:D806:CF25:DE2C:EEAC (talk) 01:00, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done Left guide (talk) 02:10, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Categories: