Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WhatamIdoing (talk | contribs) at 16:47, 5 December 2024 (→Redacted comments: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

"And while I'm alive, I'll make tiny changes to earth." Frightened Rabbit

Black Kite Hi, I'm an administrator here, and have been since 2007. I'll try to answer any questions here as soon as I can, though I do have periods where I'm not available. For admins: if you think I've done something really f***ing stupid and I don't respond to a question about it, please feel free to reverse it ... we can work it out later on.

For Talk Page Archives, click here.

If you email me via Misplaced Pages, please leave me a note here (unless there's a good reason you do not want that fact to be public). I do check my Misplaced Pages email fairly regularly, but not that regularly.

Palestine-Israel articles 5 arbitration case opened

You offered a statement in an arbitration enforcement referral. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5/Evidence. Please add your evidence by 23:59, 14 December 2024 (UTC), which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction. For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 06:14, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

RangerRus

Can you please take a look at what I added to the ANI thread.--v/r - TP 16:55, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

• Good points, and I agree. Black Kite (talk) 22:28, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Redacted comments

I don't think that this is the kind of thing that Template:Personal attack removed is meant to cover. When someone identifies a pattern of (in their eyes) racist behavior by a group of editors, we probably shouldn't call that a "personal attack".

If you come from a place where "Anglo" means "non-Latino white American", then I can imagine that being quite jarring, but I don't think that was what was meant in this case. I think the non-native speaker meant that some native English speakers are making comments that denigrate non-native English speakers, and a little re-wording might be helpful. I wonder if you might consider self-reverting. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:48, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

• WhatamIdoing Sorry, no - calling people racists is a personal attack, if you're doing it purely because you disagree with them; if there was genuine racism there then it would be a different situation; there isn't. Black Kite (talk) 11:25, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

  But English is a universal language my friends, and not the property of colonial imperialists is a statement of opinion, not directed at anyone. Except colonial imperialists I suppose, but they can look after themselves. SerialNumber54129 12:15, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

  Does your definition of "genuine racism" include practices that have an obvious Disparate impact? Mine does. I suspect that editor's does, too.

  Does your definition of "genuine racism" include subtle racism? doi:10.1177/0011000015625329 defines it this way: "Identifying contemporary racism has been problematic as this type of racism, namely subtle racism, is difficult to discern, and the actions in question can be easily justified by other causes". https://www.recurse.com/social-rules talks about "subtle -isms". They explain one of the practical consequences of subtle racism: "The “subtle” in “subtle -isms” means that it’s probably not obvious to everyone right away what was wrong with the comment." Some people, having experienced more of these "indirect and passive-aggressive acts of social exclusion", are quicker to notice racialized patterns of social exclusion. I think the editor was calling out subtle racism based on a common race+linguistic pair.

  You might also be interested in what Linguistic racism has to say, e.g., "Covert linguistic racism, on the other hand, is expressed through indirect and passive-aggressive acts of social exclusion. In the U.S., covert linguistic racism plays a role in a lack of diverse participation..."

  I don't think it's difficult to understand the POV that the proposed LLM rules amount to an "indirect" act of "social exclusion" that will result in "a lack of diverse participation". These rules will especially affect people from East Asia, "based on an individual or community's linguistic background", to quote the opening line of our article, while "maintaining this social inequality under a veneer of indirectness and deniability", to quote the end of the first paragraph. The fact is that English is easier to learn if you come from a group whose common native language was Dutch or German than if your group's native language was Chinese or Japanese. Language is part of most people's racial identity. (Consider, e.g., Language revitalization efforts by Native Americans.)

  I personally see no overt racism in the discussion. But I also think the sentiment is not completely unreasonable, and I'm not comfortable saying that there is no "genuine racism" involved. "Contemporary" styles of covert racism are genuine racism, too. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:47, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

1. Tankosić, Ana; Dovchin, Sender (7 April 2021). "(C)overt linguistic racism: Eastern-European background immigrant women in the Australian workplace". Ethnicities. 23 (5): 1–32. doi:10.1177/14687968211005104. eISSN 1741-2706. hdl:20.500.11937/91494. ISSN 1468-7968. S2CID 233600585.