Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lethargilistic (talk | contribs) at 19:10, 10 December 2024 (←Created page with '{{subst:SCOTUS-case|Ashcraft v. Tennessee|327|274|February 25|1946|Admitting narrative testimony about the interrogation that elicited an excluded confession can be considered equivalent to the excluded confession, requiring it to also be excluded.}}'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Ashcraft v. Tennessee
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 25, 1946
Full case name	Ashcraft v. Tennessee
Citations	327 U.S. 274 (more)
Holding
Admitting narrative testimony about the interrogation that elicited an excluded confession can be considered equivalent to the excluded confession, requiring it to also be excluded.
Court membership
Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone Associate Justices Hugo Black · Stanley F. Reed Felix Frankfurter · William O. Douglas Frank Murphy · Robert H. Jackson Wiley B. Rutledge · Harold H. Burton

Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 327 U.S. 274 (1946), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that admitting narrative testimony about the interrogation that elicited an excluded confession can be considered equivalent to the excluded confession, requiring it to also be excluded.

References

1. Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 327 U.S. 274 (1946).

External links

• Text of Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 327 U.S. 274 (1946) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

• v
• t
• e

• United States Supreme Court stubs
• 1946 in United States case law
• United States Supreme Court cases
• United States Supreme Court cases of the Stone Court