This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Lethargilistic (talk | contribs) at 19:27, 10 December 2024. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 19:27, 10 December 2024 by Lethargilistic (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) 1946 United States Supreme Court case| Ashcraft v. Tennessee | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States | |
| Decided February 25, 1946 | |
| Full case name | Ashcraft v. Tennessee |
| Citations | 327 U.S. 274 (more) |
| Holding | |
| Admitting narrative testimony about the interrogation that elicited an excluded confession can be considered equivalent to the excluded confession, requiring it to also be excluded. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Black, joined by unanimous |
| Concurrence | Frankfurter (in judgment) |
| Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 327 U.S. 274 (1946), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that admitting narrative testimony about the interrogation that elicited an excluded confession can be considered equivalent to the excluded confession, requiring it to also be excluded.
See also
References
- Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 327 U.S. 274 (1946).
- Bennett, John Ballard (1954). "Decade of Change Since the Ashcraft Case". Tex. L. Rev. 32: 429.
External links
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |