Misplaced Pages

B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lethargilistic (talk | contribs) at 23:46, 11 December 2024 (Created page with '{{subst:SCOTUS-case|B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.|575|138|December 2|2014|TTAB adjudications of trademark infringement can preclude issues for district courts.}}'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 23:46, 11 December 2024 by Lethargilistic (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{subst:SCOTUS-case|B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.|575|138|December 2|2014|TTAB adjudications of trademark infringement can preclude issues for district courts.}}')(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) 2014 United States Supreme Court case
B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 2, 2014
Full case nameB&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.
Citations575 U.S. 138 (more)
Holding
TTAB adjudications of trademark infringement can preclude issues for district courts.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan

B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc., 575 U.S. 138 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that tTAB adjudications of trademark infringement can preclude issues for district courts.

References

  1. B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc., 575 U.S. 138 (2014).

External links

Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: