This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lethargilistic (talk | contribs) at 23:46, 11 December 2024 (←Created page with '{{subst:SCOTUS-case|B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.|575|138|December 2|2014|TTAB adjudications of trademark infringement can preclude issues for district courts.}}'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:46, 11 December 2024 by Lethargilistic (talk | contribs) (←Created page with '{{subst:SCOTUS-case|B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.|575|138|December 2|2014|TTAB adjudications of trademark infringement can preclude issues for district courts.}}')(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) 2014 United States Supreme Court caseB&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc. | |
---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | |
Decided December 2, 2014 | |
Full case name | B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc. |
Citations | 575 U.S. 138 (more) |
Holding | |
TTAB adjudications of trademark infringement can preclude issues for district courts. | |
Court membership | |
|
B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc., 575 U.S. 138 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that tTAB adjudications of trademark infringement can preclude issues for district courts.
References
External links
- Text of B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc., 575 U.S. 138 (2014) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |