This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lethargilistic (talk | contribs) at 01:51, 12 December 2024 (Reference edited with ProveIt #proveit). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:51, 12 December 2024 by Lethargilistic (talk | contribs) (Reference edited with ProveIt #proveit)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) 2014 United States Supreme Court case| B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc. | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States | |
| Decided December 2, 2014 | |
| Full case name | B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc. |
| Citations | 575 U.S. 138 (more) |
| Holding | |
| Trademark Trial and Appeal Board adjudications of trademark infringement can preclude issues for district courts. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Alito |
| Concurrence | Ginsburg |
| Dissent | Thomas, joined by Scalia |
B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc., 575 U.S. 138 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that Trademark Trial and Appeal Board adjudications of trademark infringement can preclude issues for district courts.
References
- B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc., 575 U.S. 138 (2014).
- Janis, Mark D. (2017). Trademark and Unfair Competition in a Nutshell (2nd ed.). West Academic. p. 228.
- Opinion analysis: Justices unsettled in trademark preclusion dispute. 2015-03-25.
External links
- Text of B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc., 575 U.S. 138 (2014) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |