Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Stars in the Sky (2nd nomination) - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tails Wx (talk | contribs) at 06:01, 12 December 2024 (keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 06:01, 12 December 2024 by Tails Wx (talk | contribs) (keep)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Stars in the Sky

AfDs for this article:

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Stars in the Sky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This standalone song from Sonic the Hedgehog 2 doesn't meet WP:MUSIC. All of the the sources are just promotional stuff. It would be better if it was redirected to either Sonic the Hedgehog 2 (soundtrack) or Kid Cudi discography. Toby2023 (talk) 03:03, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Note: The first nomination appears to have been about a now-defunct disability website in the United Kingdom, a completely different and unrelated subject to the subject of the current article (the song, and the associated movie, did not even exist yet at the time of the first nomination). (No opinion or further comment at this time.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:17, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Film. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:17, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Keep If I can find something in Rolling Stone about a song, it's notable. Jclemens (talk) 06:55, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
    ... wait, that's already linked in the article? As are a couple of other clearly RS'es? Can you articulate how you believe the GNG is not met or withdraw this nomination, please? Jclemens (talk) 06:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Keep I don't agree that just because it's briefly mentioned in Rolling Stone that it should be kept, but given that there's some level of coverage from Rolling Stone Stereogum NME Complex Pitchfork Line of Best Fit The Fader and HipHopDX it's hard to imagine a situation where this is not independently notable.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vrxces (talk • contribs)
    I didn't say just Rolling Stone. But if it's been covered there, it will also have been covered elsewhere. One source can be sentinel notability, without establishing everything by itself. Jclemens (talk) 16:44, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
    That's fair logic! Sorry for the pedantry - at any rate, this is a keeper. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:43, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Keep, found this as well. With the other sources presented above, this song passes GNG (and it's a good, catchy one, too!). I might just add information gathered from those sources into the article if I find the time to do so in the short-term. Otherwise, this firmly passes notability requirements, including WP:NSONG. ~ Tails Wx 06:01, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: