Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 17:20, 12 December 2024 (Archiving 7 discussion(s) to User talk:Explicit/Archive 55) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51, 52, 53, 54, 55

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

It is approximately 3:05 AM where this user lives (South Korea).

DYK for Kang Ju-hyeok

On 6 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kang Ju-hyeok, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kang Ju-hyeok (pictured) became the youngest player in FC Seoul's history at the age of 17 years, 9 months, and 6 days? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kang Ju-hyeok. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kang Ju-hyeok), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Arambegama

I saw your edit on Arambegama (as it is still listed as having dab pages), but it appears to have no content after your edit - should it be deleted?— Rod 21:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

@Rodw:  Done. ✗plicit 00:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Kassia St. Clair

Could I please have a copy of Kassia St. Clair (which you deleted), as I had only recently added a photo to it. Edwardx (talk) 00:17, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

@Edwardx: Here's a copy. There isn't much content. ✗plicit 00:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Invicta Old Logo.gif

Why is File:Invicta Old Logo.gif deleted? I have already altered the non-free use rationale to comply with the guidelines? Marcnut1996 (talk) 00:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

@Marcnut1996: I have restored the image. If Iruka13 wishes to pursue it further, they should go to WP:FFD. ✗plicit 00:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for that. Marcnut1996 (talk) 00:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Baume-les-messieurs.jpg

Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:Baume-les-messieurs.jpg? It was uploaded without a copyright license or any real source information, but the EXIF data indicates it might be Getty Images stock photo. I tried searching for the image and found it here on Getty page in Korean, but I can't find how the file's being licensed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:04, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

https://www.istockphoto.com/en/%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84/%EB%B4%84-%EB%A0%88-%EB%A9%94%EC%8B%9C%EC%99%B8%EB%A5%B4-%EC%9E%88%EB%8A%94-%EC%A3%BC%EB%9D%BC-gm178824413-25187314 —Cryptic 09:24, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for that Cryptic. I thought the file might be eligible for speedy deletion per F9, but you deleting the file for that reason takes care of that too. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:22, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

@Cryptic and Explicit: File:Luigi Mangione Smiling Github Profile Photo.jpeg is another one uploaded (by a different uploader though) that has no copyright license and is sourced to some kind of social media site. I explained the issue (at least what I perceive to be the issue) with this file to the uploader on their user talk page, but they haven't responded yet. FWIW, I'm not seeing any way for Misplaced Pages to keep this absent an acceptable free license or VRT verification since I don't think it can be converted to non-free. I suggested to the uploader that they tag the file for speedy deletion per G7, but this probably also meets F9. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:06, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Github isn't exactly social-media, but it is user-generated content. I'm less comfortable deleting those as F9s, since there's usually some chance the author's contactable and amenable to freely licensing the image. If it's the same person that Luigi Mangione is redirecting to, that's, um, probably not going to happen here. Definitely not usable as nonfree either way. I'd let it wait out the week to be deleted as an F4 for not having a known license. —Cryptic 12:28, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for taking a look at this Cryptic. Although your approach seems reasonable to me, another user has tagged the file for speedy deletion per F9, and I'm not sure I should remove the tag at this point. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:50, 12 December 2024 (UTC)