Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Humanengr (talk | contribs) at 17:48, 12 December 2024 (→Tulsi Gabbard: revised). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user is new to Misplaced Pages. Please assume good faith, remain civil, and be calm, patient, helpful, and polite while they become accustomed to Misplaced Pages and its intricacies.

California Supreme Court Historical Society

Hi Marincyclist, I have moved the article you created to Draft:California Supreme Court Historical Society. I have moved it to draftspace to allow you to add sufficient sources to meet our notability requirements for organisations. Thanks! AusLondonder (talk) 05:49, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

@AusLondonder Thanks for letting me know, I added some more sources to the article. Let me know what you think. Best, Marincyclist (talk) 04:00, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Comparison of Lake Tahoe area ski resorts

Hello Marincyclist, and thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Comparison of Lake Tahoe area ski resorts, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Lake Tahoe area ski resorts.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Miminity}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 10:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mount Rose Ski Tahoe

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mount Rose Ski Tahoe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:45, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mount Rose Ski Tahoe

The article Mount Rose Ski Tahoe you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mount Rose Ski Tahoe for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 05:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Tulsi Gabbard

Your edits to Tulsi Gabbard have been, virtually without exception, problematic, violating policy and guidelines. Given that you are a newbie, I WP:AGF on your part.

Your argument here grossly conflated the points made in the interview. A close reading would not lead down this path.

Beyond that, your first edit, among other things, changed Gabbard met various political and religious leaders from Syria and Lebanon to Gabbard claims she met various political and religious leaders from Syria and Lebanon. For this you cited this ABC article. In your 4th edit, your edit summary said gabbard claims the meetings with assad were unplanned, but we don't know if this is true. changed to reflect this.

If you're going to doubt what Gabbard says, then you would have to also doubt she met Assad, as the aforementioned cite is entitled Tulsi Gabbard Claims to Have Met With Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

After your 1st large edit on Syria, I made a series of corrections and restorations of informative material you had deleted.

You then made large revision on Syria, which I reverted with edit summary Reverting edits w unsourced or misrepresented claims about Gabbard per WP:BLP. Please discuss on Talk. I also opened a section on the Talk page and repeated my request there that you Please bring your proposed edits here so we can discuss rather than edit war.

You did not comply with my request, but rather did another large revision.

Then after it was again reverted, you did another large revision.

I reverted with ES Your first sentence is not supported by cited source. Much else problematic after that, Discuss on Talk, one small edit or isolated issue at a time. I posted on Talk As I wrote in the undo, discuss here, one small edit or isolated issue at a time w ES Pls stop with the wholesale revisions.

Muboshgu (who is an admin) followed shortly thereafter with a request to try telling us what you want to change and why, with sourcing, here.

But rather than comply, you presumptively went straight to editing the lead §.

Your editing is WP:TENDENTIOUS, WP:DISRUPTIVE, and can lead to a WP:BLOCK.

Humanengr (talk) 08:31, 12 December 2024 (UTC)