This is the current revision of this page, as edited by FACBot (talk | contribs) at 00:15, 15 December 2024 (Archiving 'The Hardy Boys'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 00:15, 15 December 2024 by FACBot (talk | contribs) (Archiving 'The Hardy Boys')(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 8:50, 14 December 2024 (UTC) .
The Hardy Boys
- Notified: WikiProject Children's literature, WikiProject Novels, WikiProject Fictional characters, Ricardiana
Review section
I am nominating this featured article for review because...This old article isn't written properly. Some of the citations are poorly formatted, for example. the lack of authors and etc. + There are several unsourced statements and too many quote tables + It needs some updates for books and video game appearances + the books, in-other media (should be converted into prose written style, not lists), comics, and especially the video game sections are a mess + Thematic analysis and reception could be expanded. Overall, it needs some love to meet its current FA standard. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 06:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- From a cursory read, the quote tables do certainly seem a bit odd. They don't provide much context for the work for someone not familiar, and they don't (at first glance) support the content in the text in an obvious way... added captions to put the quotes in context might help. Some parts ("It has been a matter of disagreement regarding the treatment of minorities in the books.") seem like they would fit better in a criticism or reception section. Caleb Stanford (talk) 16:31, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Move to FARC: Agree with concerns raised above, and no progress to resolve them. Z1720 (talk) 02:21, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
FARC section
- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and organization. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delist. Tagged for needing prose work since June. Unsourced statements including "it is unknown", "for unknown reasons", "lifelong fan" and "successful". Miscellaneous other media and video games sections are lists of selected works instead of summarizing the cultural impact and are either unsourced or rely on primary sources. DrKay (talk) 14:15, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delist: No edits since November, uncited statements and disorganization remain. Z1720 (talk) 02:24, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:50, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.