Misplaced Pages

User talk:Explicit

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Historyk.ok (talk | contribs) at 17:58, 17 December 2024 (Restoration of article: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:58, 17 December 2024 by Historyk.ok (talk | contribs) (Restoration of article: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55



This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

It is approximately 2:56 AM where this user lives (South Korea).

DYK for Kang Ju-hyeok

On 6 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kang Ju-hyeok, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kang Ju-hyeok (pictured) became the youngest player in FC Seoul's history at the age of 17 years, 9 months, and 6 days? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kang Ju-hyeok. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kang Ju-hyeok), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Arambegama

I saw your edit on Arambegama (as it is still listed as having dab pages), but it appears to have no content after your edit - should it be deleted?— Rod 21:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

@Rodw:  Done. plicit 00:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Kassia St. Clair

Could I please have a copy of Kassia St. Clair (which you deleted), as I had only recently added a photo to it. Edwardx (talk) 00:17, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

@Edwardx: Here's a copy. There isn't much content. plicit 00:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Invicta Old Logo.gif

Why is File:Invicta Old Logo.gif deleted? I have already altered the non-free use rationale to comply with the guidelines? Marcnut1996 (talk) 00:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

@Marcnut1996: I have restored the image. If Iruka13 wishes to pursue it further, they should go to WP:FFD. plicit 00:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for that. Marcnut1996 (talk) 00:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Baume-les-messieurs.jpg

Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:Baume-les-messieurs.jpg? It was uploaded without a copyright license or any real source information, but the EXIF data indicates it might be Getty Images stock photo. I tried searching for the image and found it here on Getty page in Korean, but I can't find how the file's being licensed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:04, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

https://www.istockphoto.com/en/%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84/%EB%B4%84-%EB%A0%88-%EB%A9%94%EC%8B%9C%EC%99%B8%EB%A5%B4-%EC%9E%88%EB%8A%94-%EC%A3%BC%EB%9D%BC-gm178824413-25187314Cryptic 09:24, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for that Cryptic. I thought the file might be eligible for speedy deletion per F9, but you deleting the file for that reason takes care of that too. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:22, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
@Cryptic and Explicit: File:Luigi Mangione Smiling Github Profile Photo.jpeg is another one uploaded (by a different uploader though) that has no copyright license and is sourced to some kind of social media site. I explained the issue (at least what I perceive to be the issue) with this file to the uploader on their user talk page, but they haven't responded yet. FWIW, I'm not seeing any way for Misplaced Pages to keep this absent an acceptable free license or VRT verification since I don't think it can be converted to non-free. I suggested to the uploader that they tag the file for speedy deletion per G7, but this probably also meets F9. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:06, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Github isn't exactly social-media, but it is user-generated content. I'm less comfortable deleting those as F9s, since there's usually some chance the author's contactable and amenable to freely licensing the image. If it's the same person that Luigi Mangione is redirecting to, that's, um, probably not going to happen here. Definitely not usable as nonfree either way. I'd let it wait out the week to be deleted as an F4 for not having a known license. —Cryptic 12:28, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for taking a look at this Cryptic. Although your approach seems reasonable to me, another user has tagged the file for speedy deletion per F9, and I'm not sure I should remove the tag at this point. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:50, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Fuzhou Oyster Cake

Hi - I'm contacting you because you are the admin who speedy deleted the redirect created when a user WP:DRAFTIFYed an article I created with no notification to me, and what I think is an explanation at odds with what are described as valid reasons in DRAFTIFY; I just want to make sure I didn't miss anything. I do like to create stubs on things which seem to have enough sources, but I don't have the expertise (language or knowledge-base) to really interpret. Thanks! Tduk (talk) 17:28, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

@Tduk: Hi, per WP:DRAFTOBJECT, you are free to move it back into mainspace if you object to the draftification of the article. You may also want to contact the user who moved the page to better understand and perhaps address their concerns. plicit 23:54, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Nicolás Atanes un-protection

Heya @Explicit, I just accepted Nicolás Atanes via AfC, I think it passes notability - would you mind unprotecting the talk page so I can correctly move it? qcne (talk) 21:57, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Restoration of article

Hello, I would like to ask if there is still a chance to restore the articles. @Lenovya They had real sources and were really well done and didn't break Misplaced Pages rules. Thank you in advance for your answer @Explicit Historyk.ok (talk) 17:58, 17 December 2024 (UTC)