Misplaced Pages

Talk:Mao Zedong

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 17:46, 18 December 2024 (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Mao Zedong/Archive 11) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:46, 18 December 2024 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Mao Zedong/Archive 11) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mao Zedong article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This  level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconBiography: Military / Politics and Government / Core
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is listed on the project's core biographies page.
WikiProject iconChina: History Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history (assessed as Top-importance).
WikiProject iconAsia Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconDeath High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCold War Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Biography / Asian / Chinese / World War II / Cold War
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military biography task force
Taskforce icon
Asian military history task force
Taskforce icon
Chinese military history task force
Taskforce icon
World War II task force
Taskforce icon
Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Philosophers / Social and political / Eastern / Contemporary Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Misplaced Pages.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Philosophers
Taskforce icon
Social and political philosophy
Taskforce icon
Eastern philosophy
Taskforce icon
Contemporary philosophy
WikiProject iconAtheism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
For more information and how you can help, click the link opposite:

If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit the project page.

Quick help

Recent activity


To do

Join WikiProject atheism and be bold.

Be consistent

  • Use a "standard" layout for atheism-related articles (see layout style, "The perfect article" and Featured articles).
  • Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box)
  • Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether ] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.

Maintenance, etc.

Articles to improve

Create

  • Articles on notable atheists


Expand

Immediate attention

  • State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
  • False choice into False dilemma: discuss whether you are for or against this merge here
  • Clarify references in Atheism using footnotes.
  • Secular movement defines it as a being restricted to America in the 21st century.
WikiProject iconPolitics High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSocialism Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Section sizes
Section size for Mao Zedong (53 sections)
Section name Byte
count
Section
total
(Top) 11,497 11,497
English romanisation of name 1,129 1,129
Early life 52 11,413
Youth and the Xinhai Revolution: 1893–1911 6,834 6,834
Fourth Normal School of Changsha: 1912–1919 4,527 4,527
Early revolutionary activity 35 19,659
Beijing, anarchism, and Marxism: 1917–1919 3,179 3,179
New Culture and political protests: 1919–1920 5,339 5,339
Founding the Chinese Communist Party: 1921–1922 5,688 5,688
Collaboration with the Kuomintang: 1922–1927 5,418 5,418
Civil War 73 19,364
Nanchang and Autumn Harvest Uprisings: 1927 2,964 2,964
Base in Jinggangshan: 1927–1928 6,247 6,247
Jiangxi Soviet Republic of China: 1929–1934 5,688 5,688
Long March: 1934–1935 4,392 4,392
World War II 7,754 7,754
Leadership of China 96 42,558
Establishment of the People's Republic of China 4,283 4,283
Korean War 1,710 1,710
Social reform 6,972 6,972
Three-anti and Five-anti Campaigns 2,521 2,521
Five-year plans 4,816 4,816
Military projects 2,392 2,392
Great Leap Forward 6,882 6,882
Split from Soviet Union 3,081 3,081
Third Front 3,881 3,881
Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution 5,924 5,924
State visits 1,484 1,484
Death and aftermath 8,947 8,947
Legacy 9,413 41,000
In China 7,624 7,624
Outside China 9,650 9,650
Third World 3,581 3,581
Military strategy 1,795 1,795
Literature 1,630 1,630
Public image 7,307 7,307
Genealogy 17 6,209
Ancestors 792 792
Wives 666 666
Siblings 1,064 1,064
Children 3,670 3,670
Personal life 3,379 3,379
Writings and calligraphy 5,951 7,378
Literary works 1,427 1,427
Portrayal in media 2,922 2,922
See also 137 137
Notes 26 26
References 30 30
Bibliography 3,461 3,461
Further reading 924 924
External links 116 9,756
General 1,454 1,454
Commentary 8,186 8,186
Total 199,027 199,027

Recent change

@Amigao: Why restored the content that does not exist in main body in the article("deaths of 15 to 55 million people", "lasted for 10 years") or possible MOS:EDITORIAL ("Conversely")? Y-S.Ko (talk) 00:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

I am in agreement with @Y-S.Ko. Much of the trimming was fluff. I had a different reason for agreeing about trimming deaths for Great Leap Forward, namely that we already have a good deal of millions of death material in the lead. JArthur1984 (talk) 00:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
I don't disagree with this as stated. Remsense ‥  00:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
A few bullet points, some not directly related to the main reason for reversion:
  • Conversely is a word to watch, but the way it is being used here is clearly fine, as the two perspectives are clearly not compatible in most cases. In fact, your phrasing itself plausibly implies that the two views are
  • Your linking of Hunan runs afoul of WP:SOB.
  • While 55 million may not be attested in the article here, it is clearly cited at the article linked. The most productive thing to do here is to copy the references over, not force others to go and do it on your behalf. I don't think there's an NPOV justification in omitting figures as such.
  • Your removal of any mention of escalation or motion is not encyclopedic in my view, akin to above, it actually has the unintended effect of mischaracterizing events by describing them as little as possible. There is a point where slimming summaries goes too far, and in this case you've crossed it imo.
Remsense ‥  00:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
  • If the phrase give the impression "two perspectives are clearly not compatible", which is not well-sourced fact, then the phrase must be fixed.
  • I removed the content that does not exist in main body, but link to Great Chinese Famine is remained, which ("great ... famine") give impression of numerous deaths already, without worrying on the contents does not exist in main body. and general number of deaths is already treated in last paragraph of lead section (whose contents exists in main body of the article).
Y-S.Ko (talk) 01:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
I'm saying that whatever the relationship is, your particular juxtaposition also creates a synthetic connotation to my eye. I'm sure you've seen it, but the examples given at WP:SYNTH are pretty analogous to the contention here, though without an explicit linking and, it's analogous. Remsense ‥  02:03, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
The examples in WP:SYNTH are problematic, because "but" and "only" gave some sort of impression, which is not neutral. "Conversely" creates much stronger non-neutral impression than my phrasing. My phrasing does not include these sort of words. I think my phrasing has less problematic connotation, and more neutral than using such problematic words. Of course, the best option is giving no impression about the two perspectives' compatibility. Y-S.Ko (talk) 03:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
I am saying the effect is subtler: I would not find an argument compelling that mere juxtaposition cannot ever take up its own connotations in this context. But it is a minor tone issue. Remsense ‥  04:30, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Mao Zedong's heart attacks and reported time of death

At the time of writing this talk topic the Death and aftermath section of the article page reads:

"He suffered two major heart attacks, one in March and another in July, then a third on 5 September, rendering him an invalid. He died nearly four days later, on 9 September 1976, at the age of 82. The Communist Party delayed the announcement of his death until 16:00, when a national radio broadcast announced the news and appealed for party unity."

For starters, the referenced source that was apparently retrieved on 25 October 2014 is a broken link, and the currently accessible live version of the same article source now has "https://archive.nytimes.com/" appended to the beginning of the url as follows: https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/big/0909.html

Now the main contention: The referenced source only mentions that Mao Zedong died at 12:10 a.m. on September 9, but it does not mention how many heart attacks Mao Zedong had, nor the time that Mao had the heart attacks, therefore the following quoted claim does not currently have a source attributed to it:

"He suffered two major heart attacks, one in March and another in July, then a third on 5 September, rendering him an invalid. He died nearly four days later..."

The same sourcing issue is apparent in regard to information described in the article about the Death and state funeral of Mao Zedong, which uses the same source attribution and currently reads:

"At around 17:00 on 5 September 1976, Mao had a heart attack, far more severe than his previous two earlier that year which affected a much larger area of his heart, leaving him bedridden. On the afternoon of 7 September, Mao's condition completely deteriorated. Mao's organs failed quickly and he fell into a coma shortly before noon and was put on a ventilator and life support machines.
On 8 September, when it was clear the comatose Mao was beyond recovery, Chinese government officials decided to disconnect his life support machines at midnight..."

Is anyone able to find a source that verifies these claims that time Mao Zedong's heart attacks to March, July, and 17:00 on 5 September?

I have identified a source by James Palmer (Chapter 6: "You die, I live" of Heaven Cracks, Earth Shakes: The Tangshan Earthquake and the Death of Mao's China, published 3 January 2012) that alternatively claims that Mao Zedong suffered a heart attack at about 5:00 p.m. on September 2. This source is also referenced at least one time by other authors including in Chapter 7: "Selective Integration" of Peter Martin's China's Civilian Army: The Making of Wolf Warrior Diplomacy, published 2021.

Is anyone able to find any reliable sources earlier than 3 January 2012 that affirmatively verify that Mao Zedong had heart attacks in March, July, 2 September and/or 5 September, 1976?

As Mao Zedong's heart attacks thus far have an identifiable source attribution referenced to James Palmer's Heaven Cracks, Earth Shakes (2012), I can propose a revision to the article on the Death and state funeral of Mao Zedong as follows, however someone with greater editing privileges can investigate making changes to the main Mao Zedong page.

e.g. "At around 17:00 on 2 September 1976, Mao had a heart attack..."

and so on. Re.educated (talk) 21:40, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Luckily, Spence (1998) has us covered, pp. 176–177:
On June 26, Mao had a second heart attack. A third came on September 2, more serious than the previous two, leaving him weakened and comatose. On September 8, he was alert enough to spend some short periods reading reports, but he dozed off repeatedly. Around 11:15 P.M., he drifted into a coma. Ten minutes after midnight, on September 9, 1976, Mao died in the presence of the ranking members of the Politburo, who had been summoned to his room, and his attendant physicians.

Remsense ‥  22:13, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 December 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

As discussed in Talk:Mao Zedong#Mao Zedong's heart attacks and reported time of death, it is advised that in the section on Mao_Zedong#Death_and_aftermath the following sentence:

"He suffered two major heart attacks, one in March and another in July, then a third on 5 September, rendering him an invalid."

Should be changed into something like:

"He suffered two major heart attacks, one in March and another in July, then a third on 2 September at about 5:00 p.m., rendering him an invalid." Re.educated (talk) 22:09, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done My own way, at least. That should work, right? Remsense ‥  22:33, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Noting that according to Spence the second one was actually in late June... I think so. Thanks! 👏 Re.educated (talk) 22:42, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for giving me something quick, concrete, and important to do! Remsense ‥  22:43, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
  1. "Mao Tse-Tung Dies In Peking At 82; Leader Of Red China Revolution; Choice Of Successor Is Uncertain". The New York Times. Retrieved 25 October 2014.
  2. Martin, Peter (20 May 2021). "7 Selective Integration". China's Civilian Army: The Inside Story of China's Quest for Global Power. New York: Oxford Academic. p. 127. doi:10.1093/oso/9780197513705.003.0008. ISBN 9780197513736.
  3. Palmer, James (3 January 2012). "6 You die, I live". Heaven Cracks, Earth Shakes: The Tangshan Earthquake and the Death of Mao's China. New York: Basic Books. p. 196. ISBN 9780465023493.
  4. Palmer, James (3 January 2012). "6 You die, I live". Heaven Cracks, Earth Shakes: The Tangshan Earthquake and the Death of Mao's China. New York: Basic Books. p. 196. ISBN 9780465023493.
Categories: