Misplaced Pages

Comptroller of the Treasury v. Wynne

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lethargilistic (talk | contribs) at 16:09, 19 December 2024 (Created page with '{{subst:SCOTUS-case|Comptroller of the Treasury v. Wynne|575|542|May 18|2015|An income tax scheme that taxes residents for in-state and out-of-state income violates the Dormant Commerce Clause when it does not provide residents with full credit for the income taxes they pay to other states.}}'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:09, 19 December 2024 by Lethargilistic (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{subst:SCOTUS-case|Comptroller of the Treasury v. Wynne|575|542|May 18|2015|An income tax scheme that taxes residents for in-state and out-of-state income violates the Dormant Commerce Clause when it does not provide residents with full credit for the income taxes they pay to other states.}}')(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) 2015 United States Supreme Court case
Comptroller of the Treasury v. Wynne
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 18, 2015
Full case nameComptroller of the Treasury v. Wynne
Citations575 U.S. 542 (more)
Holding
An income tax scheme that taxes residents for in-state and out-of-state income violates the Dormant Commerce Clause when it does not provide residents with full credit for the income taxes they pay to other states.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan

Comptroller of the Treasury v. Wynne, 575 U.S. 542 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that an income tax scheme that taxes residents for in-state and out-of-state income violates the Dormant Commerce Clause when it does not provide residents with full credit for the income taxes they pay to other states.

References

  1. Comptroller of the Treasury v. Wynne, 575 U.S. 542 (2015).

External links

Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: