Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lethargilistic (talk | contribs) at 20:57, 20 December 2024 (←Created page with '{{subst:SCOTUS-case|Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n|592|___|December 10|2020|State statutes are only preempted by ERISA if they have an "impermissible connection" to ERISA plans or they "refer to" ERISA plans.}}'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 10, 2020
Full case name	Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n
Citations	592 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
State statutes are only preempted by ERISA if they have an "impermissible connection" to ERISA plans or they "refer to" ERISA plans.
Court membership
Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Clarence Thomas · Stephen Breyer Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch Brett Kavanaugh · Amy Coney Barrett

Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n, 592 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that state statutes are only preempted by ERISA if they have an "impermissible connection" to ERISA plans or they "refer to" ERISA plans.

References

1. Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n, 592 U.S. ___ (2020).

External links

• Text of Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n, 592 U.S. ___ (2020) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

• v
• t
• e

• United States Supreme Court stubs
• 2020 in United States case law
• United States Supreme Court cases
• United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court