Misplaced Pages

Talk:Louis Abramson

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RoySmith (talk | contribs) at 00:21, 22 December 2024 (→Note for future work: Done with 667 Eastern Pkwy). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:21, 22 December 2024 by RoySmith (talk | contribs) (→Note for future work: Done with 667 Eastern Pkwy)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography: Arts and Entertainment
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconArchitecture Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
A fact from Louis Abramson appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 December 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
  • Did you know... that Louis Abramson worked on the renovation of a building that he designed 57 years earlier?
A record of the entry may be seen at Misplaced Pages:Recent additions/2024/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Louis Abramson.
Misplaced Pages

Note for future work

Buildings:

References

  1. "Findlay House in New York City | high-rise building". Phorio. Retrieved 2021-04-12.
  2. "Building at 116 John Street". National Park Service: Nation Register of Historic Places Program. Retrieved 2021-04-12.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  3. "Home Insurance Company Building in New York City | high-rise building". Phorio. Retrieved 2021-04-12.
  4. "139 East 79th Street in New York City | high-rise building". Phorio. Retrieved 2021-04-12.
  5. "Dazian Pavilion in New York City | high-rise building". Phorio. Retrieved 2021-04-12.
  6. "335 West 35th Street in New York City | high-rise building". Phorio. Retrieved 2021-04-12.
  7. "Abramson, Louis Allen Archives". LANDMARK WEST. Retrieved 2021-04-12.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Misplaced Pages talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 18:18, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

( ) Daughters of Jacob HomeDaughters of Jacob Home
  • ... that Louis Abramson worked on the renovation of a building (pictured) he had designed 57 years earlier?
Moved to mainspace by RoySmith (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 43 past nominations.

RoySmith (talk) 02:32, 12 November 2024 (UTC).

  • Hi RoySmith, review follows: a QPQ has been carried out (in progress); article was moved to mainspace on 12 November and exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources except for one paragraph which I have tagged; I didn't pick up on any overly close paraphrasing from the sources in a spotcheck on some of the online ones; Earwig comes back generally OK, though I wonder if "on 167th Street between Findlay and Teller Avenues in the Bronx" could be rephrased to avoid being identical to the source? hook fact is interesting enough, mentioned in the article and checks out to sources cited; image is OK, could be cropped a little to remove the margin. Do you have confirmation it was published prior to 1929? Noting the statement that the NY public library couldn't determine copyright of the image - Dumelow (talk) 19:21, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Dumelow Thank you for the review. I've supplied the missing citation. As for the paraphrasing, I think WP:LIMITED applies here. I tried a few rewordings, but they're all rather awkward and forced, so I'm inclined to leave it as is. I think cropping the image would be an aesthetic negative.

The more interesting question is the provenance of the image vis-a-vis whether it is PD or not. https://www.vera.org/news/vera-schweitzer-the-vera-institutes-worthy-namesake says the image appeared in a 1931 annual report, so that's at least an upper bound for the date, admittedly 2 years shy of the 1929 magic line in the sand. Wurts Brothers was a well-known photography firm specializing in architectural work. I think it's reasonable to assume they took the photo soon after the building was completed, but I have been unable to find any hard evidence that it predates 1929. RoySmith (talk) 20:16, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Works for me. Not an expert on images so happy to leave decision whether to use up to promoter/posting admin - Dumelow (talk) 20:28, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
I'm possibly putting my head in the lion's mouth, but Nikkimaria is my usual go-to on image licensing questions. RoySmith (talk) 21:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
The current tagging is likely incorrect (unless there's an earlier publication that hasn't been identified), but I'd suggest checking for copyright renewal on the 1931 report - it likely wouldn't have been renewed which means this is likely out of copyright. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:27, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Dumelow OK, let's run this without the image:

ALT1 ... that Louis Abramson worked on the renovation of a building he had designed 57 years earlier?

which is a bit of a shame, but I'd rather be right than guess. In the meantime, I've located an archive here in NYC that looks like it has all the annual reports from the years in question. I'll get over there at some point and hopefully be able to nail this down. RoySmith (talk) 22:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Just to confirm ALT1 is approved. An interesting building, surprised it doesn't have its own article yet - Dumelow (talk) 08:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
That may yet happen. I had started work on User:RoySmith/drafts/1201 Findlay Ave and while researching the building, learned about Abramson and ended up going down that rathole first. RoySmith (talk) 14:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)


Art Moderne?

@Beyond My Ken I just added your photo of the Countee Cullen Branch to the article. In the commons description you mention that it is in the "Art Moderne" style; do you have a WP:RS for that? RoySmith (talk) 15:02, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Never mind, I found https://www.nyc.gov/assets/planning/download/pdf/plans/malcolm-x-boulevard/mxb.pdf RoySmith (talk) 15:58, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: