This is an old revision of this page, as edited by XOR'easter (talk | contribs) at 14:12, 22 December 2024 (→Cherilyn Elston: rd). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:12, 22 December 2024 by XOR'easter (talk | contribs) (→Cherilyn Elston: rd)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Cherilyn Elston
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Cherilyn Elston (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article has been around for a few years but does not indicate how the subject is notable per WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or WP:NACADEMIC. ... discospinster talk 17:41, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women, Language, and United Kingdom. ... discospinster talk 17:41, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Delete.I found three reviews of her book Women’s Writing in Colombia , possibly enough to write an article on the book and redirect to it, but not enough by itself for WP:AUTHOR. The article claims her to be editor of Palabras Errantes, but this is not a significant literary journal, but rather a sporadic and defunct translation project with a usurped web page; it is not enough for WP:PROF#C8. There seems to be nothing else. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:54, 19 December 2024 (UTC)- Here's a link to the third review that worked better for me. All three of these reviews provide substantial depth of coverage, I'd say, so Women's Writing in Colombia would meet WP:NBOOK. XOR'easter (talk) 19:58, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I went ahead and made an article about the book. XOR'easter (talk) 22:16, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to the new article on the book, our usual procedure when someone has authored a notable and bluelinked book but does not appear to be independently notable. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:10, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - per findings above. Deriannt (talk) 19:05, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:00, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect: to the article about the book (as explained above), I don't think this person is quite notable outside of the book. Oaktree b (talk) 22:40, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect Scopus profile also does not indicate highly cited per nprof. Agreed with above redirect to the article on the book. ResonantDistortion 14:01, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to the book, with thanks to XOR'easter for writing the article. Agree the GS profile does not suggest WP:PROF is met. Espresso Addict (talk) 03:39, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. No secondary sourcing to prove WP:GNG. Suggest your new draft for the book you mention for review here: .TitCrisse (talk) 03:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- The article about the book already exists. We don't need to suggest a draft of it for review. XOR'easter (talk) 14:07, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Women's Writing in Colombia per standard procedure when an author is not wiki-notable but a single book is. No prejudice against recreating an article about Elston herself should the situation change, e.g., a second book becomes notable. XOR'easter (talk) 14:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)