Misplaced Pages

9th Military Region (Brazil)

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Torimem (talk | contribs) at 19:27, 22 December 2024 (Hermes Reform). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:27, 22 December 2024 by Torimem (talk | contribs) (Hermes Reform)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
9th Military Region
Coat of arms
Active1821
CountryBrazil
AllegianceBrazilian Army
Part ofWestern Military Command
Garrison/HQCampo Grande, Brazil
Nickname(s)Mello e Cáceres Region
Website9rm.eb.mil.br
Commanders
Current commanderCol. Pedro A. L. Varandas
Place
Military unit

The 9th Military Region (Portuguese: 9.ª Região Militar, 9.ª RM) is an administrative command of the Brazilian Army based in Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, with jurisdiction over that state and Mato Grosso. This corresponds to the area of the Western Military Command, to which the region is subordinated, currently tasked with personnel management and oversight responsibilities.

The states under its jurisdiction originated as a distant, militarized frontier during the colonial period, with demographic development beginning around bases and fortifications along the Paraguay and Guaporé rivers. The Arms Government of the province of Mato Grosso, established in 1821, is considered the precursor of the modern Military Region. After the Paraguayan invasion (1864–1868), the province became the third-largest military contingent in the Empire of Brazil. However, in the early decades of the First Brazilian Republic, military service in Mato Grosso was stigmatized; it was a region with poor accessibility and harsh working conditions, often used as a transfer destination for dissenters and "incorrigibles". Military personnel serving there were typically outsiders.

On the other hand, officers in Mato Grosso held significant social, economic, and political influence, often participating in the frequent armed struggles for the state government during Brazil's early republican period. The regional command underwent several reorganizations, becoming the 7th Military District (1891), the 13th Military Region (1908), the Military Circumscription of Mato Grosso (1915), the 1st Military Circumscription (1919), and finally the 9th Military Region (1934). The arrival of the Northwest Brazil Railway in the southern part of the state (which was not yet separated from the northern part) in 1914 improved transportation but did not eliminate the logistical challenges. However, it prompted the transfer of the headquarters to its current location, Campo Grande, in 1919. The southern part of the state then became the primary concentration of troops.

In the 1920s, Mato Grosso was a focal point of tenentist conspiracies, and in the following decade, it became an important theater of operations during the Constitutionalist Revolution of 1932. From 1946 to 1985, the Military Region was subordinated to the Central Military Zone/II Army, based in São Paulo. The brigades and divisions created in Mato Grosso were not subordinated to the 9th Military Region, which currently does not command combat units.

History

Early years and control of the rivers

Atlas of the State of Mato Grosso in 1908

The military presence and occupation of the borders have shaped the history of Mato Grosso and Mato Grosso do Sul since the establishment of the Captaincy of Mato Grosso in the mid-18th century. Rivaling the Spanish Empire for dominance over the heart of South America, the Overseas Council of the Portuguese Empire created the captaincy in 1748 to make the "colony of Mato Grosso so powerful so that it imposes respect in its neighbors and serves as a bulwark for the entire interior of Brazil". The first Portuguese governor, Antônio Rolim de Moura, arrived in 1751 with an infantry regiment, officers, artillery pieces, and ammunition. His administration focused on fortifying the border along the Guaporé River, in present-day Mato Grosso and Rondônia, through which the captaincy communicated with the Court. In 1771, captain Luís de Albuquerque de Melo Pereira e Cáceres of the Portuguese Army assumed the governorship. His name is honored in the 9th Military Region with the title "Mello e Cáceres Region".

The territory was vast and sparsely populated. The local economy, centered on mining, was very poor, relying on external supplies of tools, weapons, ammunition, and even food. Internal communications were precarious, and these challenges persisted for many decades.

Navigation to Mato Grosso was facilitated by the Paraguay River, whose outlet to the River Plate was controlled by the Spanish. However, the Spanish advance upstream from Asunción was halted by the construction of Fort Coimbra in 1775. Located at a narrow, easily defensible point, the fort gave the Portuguese control over both banks of the river. Additional fortifications and settlements consolidated Portuguese possession of the right bank. This would become Mato Grosso's first line of defense against an invasion via river. The Miranda Prison, built in 1797, blocked Spanish progress along the Apa River. The forts, outposts, prisons, and military colonies established along Mato Grosso's borders later became the founding nuclei of many settlements.

Paraguayan War

Main article: Paraguayan War
Fort Coimbra on the banks of the Paraguay River

After the independence of South American colonies, Mato Grosso remained strategically important to Brazil as a buffer zone between the country's central provinces (Minas Gerais, São Paulo, and Rio de Janeiro) and the influences of the Platine region (Argentina, Paraguay, and Bolivia). However, by the mid-19th century, the province was one of the weakest in the Empire of Brazil, with a declining economy and population, making it a target for the ambitions of the Republic of Paraguay. In 1863, its defenses comprised only 1,415 regular soldiers (excluding the National Guard), organized into the 2nd Foot Artillery Battalion, Artillery Corps, Cavalry Corps, Hunters Battalion, and Craftsmen Company. Military authority was vested in the Arms Government (later Arms Command) of the province of Mato Grosso, created in 1821 and considered the precursor to the modern Military Region. This institution was subordinated to the provincial president.

Paraguayan troops found it relatively easy to invade Mato Grosso in 1864, initiating the Paraguayan War. The Mato Grosso Campaign was fought in the southern part of the province and was marked by the floods of the Pantanal, as well as hunger and disease, which exacted a heavy toll on the troops. Contemporary observers and historians often highlighted the element of surprise and the unpreparedness of Mato Grosso's defenses. However, historian Mário Maestri argued that authorities had been warned in advance, there were considerable stockpiles of arms and ammunition, and the local force could have reached 6,000 troops if the National Guard was mobilized. According to him, the defensive weakness stemmed from the population's unwillingness to volunteer.

Brazilian expedition to Mato Grosso during the Paraguayan War passing through Goiás

The Paraguayan offensive followed a riverine axis, capturing Fort Coimbra and the towns of Albuquerque and Corumbá, and a land axis targeting the military colonies along the Miranda and Dourados Rivers and the towns of Nioaque, Miranda, and Taquari. Despite fears of a deeper invasion, the Paraguayans never reached the provincial capital, Cuiabá. Reinforcements for the Brazilian forces came from other provinces, such as São Paulo and Minas Gerais. A Brazilian attempt to invade Paraguayan territory led to heavy losses during the Retreat from Laguna. Corumbá was temporarily retaken by Brazilian forces in 1867 and permanently in 1868, as the Paraguayans abandoned their military occupation of Mato Grosso. This withdrawal was prompted by their setbacks on another front of the war, Humaitá, which opened Paraguayan territory to invasion by the Triple Alliance.

The Mato Grosso campaign was a secondary theater of the war but had a profound impact on the local history. In the following century, battles and figures such as Carlos Camisão, Guia Lopes, and Antônio João were commemorated in monuments, street names, and public buildings, and the campaign was promoted as a cornerstone of Mato Grosso do Sul's identity. After 1870, the Paraguay River was fully opened to international navigation, attracting settlers and investments to the southern part of the province, though the region also saw an increase in foreign bandit activity and land disputes. Fearing Paraguay and Argentina, the Empire of Brazil reinforced military presence in Mato Grosso, with troop numbers fluctuating between 1,237 and 2,481 men between 1871 and 1888. By 1889, the year of the Proclamation of the Republic, Mato Grosso had the third-largest army contingent among Brazilian provinces, representing 5% of the total. Garrisons were stationed in Cuiabá, Cáceres, Nioaque, and Corumbá, also contributing to the occupation of Paraguay, which lasted until 1876.

Beyond international concerns, the army also fought against indigenous raids around Cuiabá and in the Mato Grosso backlands. These operations, combined with the need to protect the Paraguay and Guaporé Rivers with limited resources, scattered the forces across garrisons ranging from 1 to 64 soldiers. By 1884, approximately 25% of the troops served far from their unit headquarters, guarding fortresses, depots, riverbanks, and military colonies. This dispersion hindered both administrative routines and training efforts.

First Brazilian Republic and Military District

The magazine O Malho unfavorably comparing the Brazilian soldiers in Mato Grosso with the Bolivian Army: "men without uniforms, without military training, ignorant and ridiculous"

The Proclamation of the Republic was met in Mato Grosso with a small monarchist revolt by enlisted soldiers at the detachment on the Apa River's mouth on 20 December 1889. In 1891, the Arms Commands were replaced by Military Districts, subordinated to the Ministry of War, which would form major operational units in wartime. The 6th and 7th Districts, corresponding respectively to Rio Grande do Sul and Mato Grosso, were the only ones covering a single state due to their strategic importance. The district headquarters was in Cuiabá, and the units remained stationed along the rivers of the Paraná Basin. Transportation, whether by river or animal traction, was challenging, especially during droughts. Telegraphic communication with the rest of the country, a geostrategic military necessity, began only in 1891 when Cuiabá was connected to the Goiás border.

Mato Grosso was a demographic void, and most of the military personnel stationed there were from other states. The journey was long, food and accommodations were poor, and diseases ravaged both enlisted men and officers. The region carried the stigmas of being backward, violent, and uncivilized, being described by Euclides da Cunha as the army's "canicular Siberia." Transfer to Mato Grosso was considered a punishment and a career setback. Since the Imperial period, political dissenters were informally transferred there as punishment, contributing to frequent local revolts. In 1907, general Dantas Barreto criticized the "system adopted by all Republican governments of filling the ranks of the federal force there with incorrigible personnel from other garrisons". Officers did everything they could to avoid serving there, and many men, thanks to their connections, never reported for duty.

Between 1860 and 1907, the typical infantry soldier (representing more than half of those recorded in the Record Books) in Mato Grosso was from another state (especially from Northeastern Brazil), of mixed race, standing between 1.60 and 1.69 meters tall, aged 18 to 25, single, without a trade, and illiterate. Recruits from outside the state were often forcibly conscripted (known as the "blood tribute") as a way for authorities to rid themselves of certain groups, such as capoeiras from Rio de Janeiro. Others, like refugees from the Northeast's droughts, volunteered for the army as a means of survival. However, in Mato Grosso, soldiers commonly experienced delays of over twelve months in their pay. Relations between enlisted men and officers were often marked by paternalism or, until the 1910s, by crime and disobedience. Criminality was not exclusive to the army, as banditry was endemic in the region. Desertion, on the other hand, was uncommon due to the predominance of non-local recruits.

The combat strength of the district was set at 2,009 men between 1890 and 1907, distributed among the 2nd Fixed Artillery Battalion, the 7th Cavalry Regiment, and the 8th, 19th, and 21st Infantry Battalions. These were the same units from the late Brazilian Empire; only the Cavalry Regiment had its name changed. Although the local population was growing, actual troop strength tended to decline, falling from 1,570 at the beginning of the period to 625 in 1900, before recovering to 1,368 later.

Local political ambitions

Serving in Mato Grosso, on the other hand, offered an opportunity to shape local history. Military personnel embodied the presence of the state in the most isolated regions through public works, mapping, border delineation, and the exploration and settlement of unknown lands. Their presence had significant social and political importance, as military spending played a crucial role in the local economy, and the proportion of soldiers in the population was higher than in other states.

The police forces of Mato Grosso were not strong enough to rival the army, unlike the "state armies" in stronger states. In states like Minas Gerais and São Paulo, military officers were largely excluded from partisan politics. However, in Mato Grosso—a politically minor state dependent on the federal government—officers had a long history of holding public office. Their social status and prestige were comparable to those of officers in Rio Grande do Sul, where they engaged in local political disputes through alliances and family ties. The local government was led by military personnel for much of the Brazilian Empire and on five occasions during the Republic.

In the early years of the Republic, local military personnel were deeply involved in coronelistic disputes for control of the state government. Mato Grosso entered what has been termed a "revolutionary cycle", with successive outbreaks of armed violence. By 1916, the state had witnessed at least four major revolts. Historian Valmir Corrêa identified 33 armed political conflicts—not necessarily on a state-wide scale—between 1891 and 1922, as well as 26 armed actions by bandits and gangs related to political disputes, cattle rustling, and other crimes between 1872 and 1943. The southern region saw the highest concentration of conflicts. Military personnel frequently took sides in these disputes, diverted ammunition, and undermined the command chain.

The first major revolt occurred in 1892, within the national context of disputes between the military and local oligarchies following the November 3 Coup. The military supported general and former governor Antônio Maria Coelho, the first republican leader of the state. The officer corps of the 7th Military District (and part of the Brazilian Navy) mobilized all military units, marched on Cuiabá, and seized the government. However, within the army, some supported the opposing side, led by Generoso Ponce. The federal government appointed general Luiz Henrique de Oliveira Ewbank to govern the state and command the Military District, but the local military, breaking the command chain, blocked him from advancing beyond Fort Coimbra. Some radicals even proposed the establishment of the Transatlantic Republic of Mato Grosso. This movement was ultimately defeated by a militia assembled by Generoso Ponce.

Military interventions in local politics diminished in intensity in the following years, but the military continued to play a role during crises. In 1899, the militia of Antônio Pais de Barros occupied Cuiabá and prevented the Legislative Assembly from ratifying election results. Under orders from the federal government, which favored the opposition, the Military District remained neutral. In 1906, the local garrison broadly supported Generoso Ponce's revolt against the government of Pais de Barros, even though the governor had federal support. The federal government dispatched general Dantas Barreto with reinforcements, but by the time he reached Cuiabá, the revolt had succeeded, and the governor had been executed.

The railway and telegraph

Rondon at a border marker with Bolivia

In 1904, construction began on the Northwest Brazil Railway (NOB), connecting Mato Grosso to São Paulo. More than an economic venture, this project was strategic and had been debated since the 1870s, when the importance of railways for military mobilization in Europe and the difficulty of defending Mato Grosso were recognized. It was essential to shorten the travel time for reinforcements from the coast to Mato Grosso and reduce dependence on the Paraguay River, which could be blockaded by Argentina or Paraguay during hostilities. The Acre War (1899–1903), during which reinforcements from Rio Grande do Sul were sent to Corumbá (as the local garrison was deemed unreliable), confirmed to Republican authorities the need to end the region's isolation.

In addition to the railway, telegraphic communication was also essential to reach the country's "unknown" vastness. This was part of the Brazil's state-building project and, as such, involved the Ministries of War and Industry, Transport, and Public Works. Between 1900 and 1915, two commissions led by colonel Cândido Rondon extended telegraph lines to the western border and the Madeira River. Clearing the dense forest for the telegraph lines required grueling treks by soldiers, often barefoot and hungry, a hardship that military authorities utilized. From 1910 or earlier, they began transferring undisciplined soldiers to the 5th Engineering Battalion, commanded by Rondon, to work on the telegraph lines.

Hermes Reform

Main article: Reorganization of the Brazilian Army in the Old Republic
Officers of the 5th Horse Artillery Regiment, 1913

In 1908, during Hermes da Fonseca's tenure as Minister of War, the Brazilian Army initiated the first of its comprehensive reforms during the First Republic, with two complementary measures: mandatory military service, introduced by the Sortition Law, would provide the personnel needed to complete a new order of battle. In Mato Grosso, this reform transformed the 7th Military District into the 13th Military Region. Its commander, designated as the permanent inspector, would also assume leadership of a new operational body, the 5th Strategic Brigade. From 1910 onward, the command was intended to be held by a division general.

The planned troop strength increased to 3,580 men, to be supplemented by conscription. Preferably, recruits would come from the jurisdiction of the Military Region to reduce transportation costs. The military's center of gravity shifted to the southern part of the state, where the railway would pass and conflict was more likely. Units were stationed in Bela Vista and Ponta Porã, on the border with Paraguay, a country closely tied to Argentina, which was considered the likely enemy. The brigade was to be headquartered in the south-central region, either in Aquidauana or Campo Grande, commanding three infantry regiments, one cavalry regiment, and one artillery regiment. The Military Region's headquarters remained in Corumbá, the main commercial center along the Paraguay River.

Predicted organization in 1908
13th Military Region, Corumbá
  • 5th Strategic Brigade, Aquidauana
    • 13th Infantry Regiment, Corumbá
      • 37th Infantry Battalion
      • 38th Infantry Battalion
      • 39th Infantry Battalion
    • 14th Infantry Regiment, Aquidauana
      • 40th Infantry Battalion
      • 41th Infantry Battalion
      • 42th Infantry Battalion
    • 15th Infantry Regiment, Nioaque (yet to organize)
    • 17th Cavalry Regiment, Ponta Porã (yet to organize)
    • 5th Horse Artillery Regiment, Aquidauana
    • 5th Engineering Battalion, Cáceres
    • 5th Artillery Park, Aquidauana
    • 5th Machine Gun Company, Aquidauana
    • 5th Howitzer Battery, Aquidauana
    • 5th Train Squadron, Aquidauana
    • 5th Messenger Platoon, Aquidauana
  • 3rd Artillery Battalion, Corumbá
  • 3rd Cavalry Regiment, Bela Vista
  • 13th Hunters Company, Cuiabá

References

Citations

  1. ^ Ferreira 2014, p. 99.
  2. Farias 2015, p. 275-276.
  3. Esselin 2014, p. 59-61.
  4. ^ "Histórico". 9ª Região Militar. 2023-02-09. Retrieved 2023-09-03.
  5. ^ Ferreira 2010, p. 259.
  6. Ferreira 2011, p. 62.
  7. Esselin 2014, p. 60.
  8. Esselin 2014, p. 61-63.
  9. Roesler 2021, p. 517.
  10. Esselin 2014, p. 65.
  11. Esselin 2014, p. 66-67.
  12. Farias 2015, p. 127.
  13. ^ Ferreira 2014, p. 105.
  14. ^ Esselin 2014, p. 69-70.
  15. Farias 2015, p. 273.
  16. Maestri 2015, p. 107-108.
  17. Maestri 2015, p. 106, 119.
  18. ^ "A campanha do Mato Grosso". Base Administrativa do Quartel-General do Exército. 2023-06-02. Retrieved 2024-04-10.
  19. Farias 2015, p. 148-151.
  20. Farias 2015, p. 129.
  21. Maestri 2015, p. 124-125.
  22. Squinelo 2001.
  23. Ferreira 2014, p. 100-102.
  24. ^ Farias 2015, p. 163-165.
  25. Bento 1989, p. 20.
  26. Farias 2015, p. 275.
  27. Ferreira 2014, p. 108-109.
  28. Castro 2004, p. 307-308.
  29. Ferreira 2014, p. 107-108.
  30. Farias 2015, p. 117-118.
  31. Ferreira 2014, p. 118-120, 131.
  32. Ferreira 2014, p. 144.
  33. Ferreira 2014, p. 111-112, 120-122.
  34. Farias 2015, p. 175-193.
  35. Farias 2015, p. 170-174.
  36. Ferreira 2014, p. 129.
  37. Ferreira 2014, p. 123, 125.
  38. Ferreira 2014, p. 152.
  39. Ferreira 2014, p. 197-199.
  40. Ferreira 2014, p. 103.
  41. ^ Ferreira 2010, p. 272-273.
  42. Farias 2015, p. 215.
  43. ^ Farias 2015, p. 216.
  44. Arruda 2013, p. 131.
  45. ^ Ferreira 2014, p. 114.
  46. Oliveira 2015, p. 62.
  47. Arruda 2013, p. 127.
  48. Arruda 2013, p. 62.
  49. Farias 2015, p. 267.
  50. Ferreira 2010, p. 269.
  51. Arruda 2013, p. 66-68.
  52. Farias 2015, p. 231, 244.
  53. Ferreira 2010, p. 269-270.
  54. Muxfeldt & Giorgis 2022, p. 119.
  55. Ferreira 2014, p. 270-271.
  56. Arruda 2013, p. 87-91.
  57. Muxfeldt & Giorgis 2022, p. 120.
  58. Muxfeldt & Giorgis 2022, p. 120-123.
  59. Ferreira 2014, p. 114-115.
  60. Souza 2018, p. 82.
  61. Esselin 2014, p. 70.
  62. Ferreira 2014, p. 100.
  63. Ferreira 2014, p. 104, 135.
  64. McCann 2009, p. 125, 127.
  65. Farias 2015, p. 117-118, 241-242.
  66. Ferreira 2014, p. 149.
  67. Souza 2018, p. 86-98.
  68. Souza 2018, p. 88-91.
  69. Ferreira 2014, p. 105, 196.
  70. Ferreira 2014, p. 199-200, 204.
  71. Ferreira 2014, p. 111, 115-116, 131.
  72. ^ Souza 2018, p. 89-91.

Bibliography

Category: