Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Muslim migrations to Ottoman Palestine - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Butterscotch Beluga (talk | contribs) at 15:08, 24 December 2024 (Undid revision 1264953645 by Davidmanheim (talk) Removing comment by non-extended confirmed user - Please limit your participation in WP:PIA to edit requests only until extended confirmed). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:08, 24 December 2024 by Butterscotch Beluga (talk | contribs) (Undid revision 1264953645 by Davidmanheim (talk) Removing comment by non-extended confirmed user - Please limit your participation in WP:PIA to edit requests only until extended confirmed)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Muslim migrations to Ottoman Palestine

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Muslim migrations to Ottoman Palestine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article started by Icewhiz sock. Article is taken straight from Zionist propaganda: Palestinians are "recent" immigrants to Israel/Palestine, when Jewish immigration was far larger Huldra (talk) 23:53, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Keep if there is a POV bias in this page, that should be resolved by editing. If the topic is notable, which it appears to be, that wouldn't be a valid deletion rationale. Has sources, and ineligible for G5 since other contributions were made after the sock. Andre🚐 00:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep. "Article is Zionist propaganda" is not a valid deletion argument. Specifically, according to WP:SKCRIT, this is a nomination that is clearly an attempt to end an editing dispute through deletion, where dispute resolution is a more appropriate course. Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 00:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
While I agree their wording is unnecessarily combative, WP:G5 is still a valid reason to bring this here & I'm unsure how it could be considered an "attempt to end an editing dispute." Who is the editing dispute between? Butterscotch Beluga (talk) 01:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
@Butterscotch Beluga: As Andre said, the page has substantial edits from one other person and doesn't qualify for G5. The editing dispute is that Huldra is unhappy with the article's content. Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 01:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: