This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 15:04, 25 December 2024 (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 270) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 15:04, 25 December 2024 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 270) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is not the page to nominate yourself or another editor to be an administrator. To do so, please follow these instructions. |
Advice, administrator elections (AdE), requests for adminship (RfA), bureaucratship (RfB), and past request archives | ||
---|---|---|
Administrators |
| Shortcut |
Bureaucrats |
| |
AdE/RfX participants | ||
History & statistics | ||
Useful pages | ||
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Candidate | Type | Result | Date of close | Tally | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S | O | N | % | ||||
Sennecaster | RfA | Successful | 25 Dec 2024 | 230 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
Hog Farm | RfA | Successful | 22 Dec 2024 | 179 | 14 | 12 | 93 |
Graham87 | RRfA | Withdrawn by candidate | 20 Nov 2024 | 119 | 145 | 11 | 45 |
Worm That Turned | RfA | Successful | 18 Nov 2024 | 275 | 5 | 9 | 98 |
Voorts | RfA | Successful | 8 Nov 2024 | 156 | 15 | 4 | 91 |
Archives |
Most recent 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Notification of RfC: Voluntary RfA after resignation
There is an RfC on seeking tools via a voluntary RfA after resignation at Misplaced Pages:Village pump (policy) § RfC: Voluntary RfA after resignation. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:18, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Odd patterns
The currently open RfA (Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Sennecaster) has unanimous support votes (201/0/0 as of last check). I can observe that such unanimous supported RfAs are often for indviduals who have an exceptional track in copyright matters, if I remember correctly, since this area tends to be understaffed when it comes to admin capacity, as is the case with the subject of the RfA. Furthermore, for some reason, co nominations tend to be successful and self nominations tend to be unsuccessful (through means of withdrawal, WP:NOTNOW e.g wp:Requests for adminship/ToadetteEdit, or wp:SNOW e.g. wp:Requests for adminship/Numberguy6). These are a few patterns that I could find at RfAs, but I do not see a reason for the latter (co noms better than self noms). ToadetteEdit (talk) 20:34, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- All ill consider RfAs - i.e., someone ignoring all the guidance - are always self nominees. That alone would create a bias towards self nominations being less successful. The other reason is, perhaps, that !voters can't be bothered to review the track record of most candidates so for self noms will either tend to not !vote at all, or if they do !vote oppose, but will happily trust nominators and support. But without surveying !voters, who can say for sure. MarcGarver (talk) 21:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'd say that when the person is qualified and happens to self-nom, they tend to pass. Some relatively recent examples include me, Spicy, and 0xDeadbeef. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 06:20, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Why, self-noms are "prima facie evidence of power hunger", of course! /j GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 11:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Let me put it differently: If a respected user nominated someone for RfA and that RfA ended as NOTNOW, it means that something went seriously wrong, most likely the nominator did not make proper research. Most nominators do, or at least attempt to do proper research, this is why NOTNOW RfAs tend to be self-nom. Ymblanter (talk) 11:17, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Nominators also serve as coaches. They often tell the candidates if and when they should run or not run, and provide other very useful advice during the process, helping to avoid common missteps. A respected nominator can also provide a boost in supports, due to folks trusting the nominator. –Novem Linguae (talk) 17:37, 23 December 2024 (UTC)