Misplaced Pages

User talk:Aciram/Archives/2024/September

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Aciram

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) at 03:45, 26 December 2024 (Archiving 1 discussion from User talk:Aciram. (BOT)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 03:45, 26 December 2024 by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion from User talk:Aciram. (BOT))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Aciram. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.


Wish to share inputs

Greetings, I wished to share some inputs with you as peer Wikipedian, would you be comfortable? Bookku (talk) 07:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

I do not feel I can say no. However I should point out that I find writing on Misplaced Pages relaxing. Writing has always been a form of relaxation for me. But I am often severely stressed in my offline life. Because of this, I am afraid I rarely have the energy to make my articles 100 % perfect. I suffer from near constrant stress and exhaustion. Hence why I need methods to relax, and writing - as I do in Misplaced Pages - is one of them. It may look as if I am full of energy because I write a lot: but writing is merely my way of relaxing. I say this simply since I assume I must have made some sort of mistake in need of correction.
I am sure I make unintentional mistakes in case of formatting. However, as far as I remember, and I hope this rule has not changed: an article in Misplaced Pages is never finnished. I have always supported this rule. It is my earnest opinion, that many articles would never have been written, if they were expected to be perfect at the time of their posting. They will always be open for editing by others. This is a great strenght of wikipedia, and it would be a shame if those rules had changed.
I do not wish to sound dismissive of correct, vaild and constructive criticism. But I think it is fair to say, that I am almost constantly exhausted. You are welcome to share inputs, I will read them and keep them in mind, but I can not promise I have the energy for long discussions. --Aciram (talk) 12:18, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Category:Slavery in Tanzania

Category:Slavery in Tanzania has been nominated for merging. Please see Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_September_11#Category:Slavery_in_Tanzania. – Fayenatic London 11:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Katharina Valenta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katharina Valenta is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Katharina Valenta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Demt1298 (talk) 02:26, 26 September 2024 (UTC)