This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Medxvo (talk | contribs) at 07:11, 26 December 2024 (reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:11, 26 December 2024 by Medxvo (talk | contribs) (reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Medxvo (talk · contribs) 10:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: CatchMe (talk · contribs) 06:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ref 1 doesn't specifically support the preceding sentence as ref 2 does.
- Removed it, please tell me if I should replace it with another source
- "...
the pop maximalist sound
..." - "the maximalist pop sound"?- Done
- "
After filming, the three celebrated by drinking and unexpectedly continued writing
..." - is the drinking part relevant?- Replaced with "celeberated Folklore's success and and unexpectedly ..."
- "...
was composed from
..." - "was composed using"?- Done
- I have seen GAs using "synthesizers" instead of "synths".
- Done
- "...
and one of Swift's better songs
" - "and one of Swift's best songs".- Done
- "
nine out of 274
" - change "nine" to "9" for consistency and per MOS:NUMNOTES.- Done. I completely forgot about MOS:NUMNOTES
This article is almost perfect for GA! I didn't even had to separate in sections as I usually do.. All good in the verifiable (and no copyright violations according to Earwig's Copyvio), broad, neutral, stable, and illustrated criteria. I will put this 
On hold until some minor issues are addressed! CatchMe (talk · contribs) 06:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, CatchMe! I believe I've addressed all of your comments, let me know if anything needs further adjustments. Thanks so much for the review, I greatly appreciate it :)) Medxvo (talk) 07:11, 26 December 2024 (UTC)