Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by S Marshall (talk | contribs) at 17:35, 26 December 2024 (A new article). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Bridges v Hawkesworth, 21 L.J.Q.B. 75 , was an 1851 English legal case decided in the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court.

Facts

In October 1847, Bridges found bank notes on the floor of a shop. Hawkesworth, a partner in the firm owning the shop, was summoned, and Bridges gave him the notes, for Hawkesworth to give to the rightful owner.

The rightful owner did not return to claim their property, so Hawkesworth advertised the bank notes in The Times newspaper, offering to return the money (less his costs) to anyone who could describe the package in which the notes had been found, and pay an indemnity. The advertisement went unanswered. Three years elapsed, and then Bridges asked Hawkesworth for the money. Hawkesworth declined and Bridges sued. The lower court ruled for Hawkesworth.

Judgment

The lower court's judgment was reversed, and Patteson J found that Bridges' claim to the parcel outweighed Hawkesworth's.

References

1. DeScioli, Peter; Karpoff, Rachel (June 2015). "People's Judgments About Classic Property Law Cases". Human Nature. 26 (2): 191–192.
2. Bridges v Hawkesworth (Queen's Bench 1851) ("The general right of the finder to any article which has been lost as against all the world except the true owner, was established in the case of Armory v. Delamirie… The case, therefore, resolves itself into the single point, on which it appears that the learned Judge decided it: namely, whether the circumstance of the notes being found inside the defendant’s shop, gives him, the defendant, the right to have them as against the plaintiff who found them... We find therefore, no circumstances in this case to take it out of the general rule of law, that the finder of a lost article is entitled to it as against all parties except the real owner and we think that rule must prevail... Our judgment therefore is, that the plaintiff is entitled to these notes as against the defendant, and that the judgment of the Court below must be reversed, and judgment given for the plaintiff for 50 pounds. The plaintiff to have the costs of the appeal.").

• Personal property law
• 1851 in case law
• 1851 in British law
• High Court of Justice cases
• English property case law