This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Redrose64 (talk | contribs) at 22:51, 31 December 2024 (→Template-protected edit request on 27 December 2024: Jonesey95 already replied). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:51, 31 December 2024 by Redrose64 (talk | contribs) (→Template-protected edit request on 27 December 2024: Jonesey95 already replied)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | Template:Rail-interchange is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
 | This template does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 Archives | |||||||
|
|||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Edit request 4 December 2024
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: Hi, Transjakarta has just reactivated a BRT line that went out of service a few months ago. I'd like to bring back the roundel for the interchange. Thank you. Mtlh01p (talk) 09:26, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Edit request 4 December 2024
| This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: Hello, Transjakarta has just reactivated a BRT line that went out of service a few months ago. I'd like to make a modification to add the new route's roundel. Thank you. Mtlh01p (talk) 09:48, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Mtlh01p:
Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. Please do not paste code blobs into this talk page. I have said this several times in the past. Thank you. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:41, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Edit request 4 December 2024
| This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change:
{{rint|us|greyhound}} uses an outdated logo (
); Greyhound switched to its current navy blue/grey look over 10 years ago. Can anyone upload a new logo file (that still complies with WP:NFCC) for this icon? 162 etc. (talk) 22:55, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- No demos here please. That is what Template:Rail-interchange/testcases is for. Demos on this page frequently cause breakage. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:02, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- This is not a demo. This is a request for an image. 162 etc. (talk) 23:44, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- It appears that the reason this hasn't been updated is because the new logo, File:Greyhound UK logo.png, although used as non-free on four pages, is not available for use on Commons. This makes it unavailable for use in the rint template. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. 05:15, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, this is why I'm suggesting that a different image be uploaded. 162 etc. (talk) 05:26, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Understood, and until a different image is uploaded to Commons, no edit can be made to this template. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. 05:45, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, this is why I'm suggesting that a different image be uploaded. 162 etc. (talk) 05:26, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- It appears that the reason this hasn't been updated is because the new logo, File:Greyhound UK logo.png, although used as non-free on four pages, is not available for use on Commons. This makes it unavailable for use in the rint template. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. 05:15, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- This is not a demo. This is a request for an image. 162 etc. (talk) 23:44, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 9 December 2024
| This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Per my most recent edits on the sandbox and testcases pages, I rearranged the modules for Adelaide according to mode and line order, as well as removed a redunduant duplicate depreciated module for the Tonsley line (now renamed the Flinders line) since they are one and the same. I also replaced the redirect links with direct links to each of their respective pages. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 09:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- @OrdinaryScarlett: Looks fine, so
Done --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 16 December 2024
| This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add service names of London Overground, even though some of those are just redirects and probably would remain so for eternity, it's still very relevant for Mildmay line and Windrush line which already have their own articles and RDTs. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 09:05, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES.. Or at least specify the exact code to add - don't make me guess. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:29, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 18 December 2024
| This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hi, could you please add the symbols for Cercanías Asturias lines? Changes have been reflected in the sandbox. Test cases are available here.
Thanks in advance :) Esguil10 (talk) 13:48, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not keen on this. The icons are tiny, just coloured blobs. You need to zoom in several levels to make out the lettering. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:24, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback. I have modified the code a little bit so the icons don't look as small as before. They already look larger in the Test cases section. Esguil10 (talk) 18:14, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- OK, Done --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 01:19, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- OK,
- Thank you for your feedback. I have modified the code a little bit so the icons don't look as small as before. They already look larger in the Test cases section. Esguil10 (talk) 18:14, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 26 December 2024
| This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please edit the section on Shanghai as according to the edit I made in the template sandbox here. Thank you. S5A-0043🚎 13:47, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, @S5A-0043! Do the testcases at Template:Rail-interchange/testcases#Shanghai (26 December 2024 - testing) look good to you? (i.e. do the sandbox versions show what you expect?) Chlod (say hi!) 13:53, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Chlod: Yup, looks great! S5A-0043🚎 13:57, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Done with Special:Diff/1265354859. Thanks for the request! Chlod (say hi!) 14:03, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 27 December 2024
| This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello, please implement the edit for Shanghai Suburban Railway as I tested here. Thank you! Unnamelessness (talk) 13:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure about this. The file description page has licensing that appears to be contradictory. --Redrose64 🦌 (talk) 22:33, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don't really see it, as the licensing is exactly the same as the Shanghai metro logo, which is the core usage for Shanghai Metro in this template. Unnamelessness (talk) 01:38, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- OK. In parts, it's implied to be public domain, which is free content. In others, it's implied to be non-free. If there is any doubt as to its freeness, it cannot be placed on multiple pages by means of a template. --Redrose64 🦌 (talk) 16:20, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- We have examples like the Shanghai metro logo, the Suzhou Rail Transit logo with the same licensing (which are in doubt to their freeness by your claim), but those have already been placed across the relevant pages. Pretty bizzare and very unfair for this logo. Unnamelessness (talk) 16:44, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Redrose64: Are you still there? Staying out of discussion may imply WP:SILENCE. Unnamelessness (talk) 12:14, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Unnamelessness: One, I'm not online 24/7, mainly because I do have a paid job IRL (witness the huge gaps in my contribs). Two, if you have a look at what happened 2-3 days ago, you'll know that when somebody asks for help and I give it, that somebody punches me in the face. And then gets their friends to kick me too. Three, see Jonesey95's post below. --Redrose64 🦌 (talk) 22:51, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- OK. In parts, it's implied to be public domain, which is free content. In others, it's implied to be non-free. If there is any doubt as to its freeness, it cannot be placed on multiple pages by means of a template. --Redrose64 🦌 (talk) 16:20, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- I don't really see it, as the licensing is exactly the same as the Shanghai metro logo, which is the core usage for Shanghai Metro in this template. Unnamelessness (talk) 01:38, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit template-protected}}template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:44, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 30 December 2024
Hi, could you please add the symbols for the Hyderabad Metro? The changes have been updated in the sandbox. Test cases can be found here. Just a dude from earth (talk) 16:22, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: