Misplaced Pages

:Suspected sock puppets/VacuousPoet (3rd) - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ImprobabilityDrive (talk | contribs) at 03:17, 6 May 2007 ([]: Notice of resignation.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 03:17, 6 May 2007 by ImprobabilityDrive (talk | contribs) ([]: Notice of resignation.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:VacuousPoet

Suspected sockpuppeteer

VacuousPoet (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

65.73.81.131 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
ImprobabilityDrive (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Gnixon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)


Report submission by

Orangemarlin 18:59, 5 May 2007 (UTC)


Evidence


Comments
With regards to Frontier communications. It is a small phone provider in Upstate NY and a few other areas. The DSL IP address points to Rochester, NY. Frontier Communications is just the ISP. Since you are paraphrasing my comment about Wells Fargo, it is a massive banking corporation in a number of states. It does not allow the Whois to point to particular location. Frontier does. Sorry. Orangemarlin 20:39, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Sorry ID, but I know how Frontier works, and your obfuscation has no meaning to me. I don't care where you live, but it's pretty clear you live in Rochester, NY probably in the same house, with the same name, and same face as one VacuousPoet, etc. And the rest of your comments are just fodder for other areas where the community is looking into your habits. If you are right, the checkuser will be denied. If you are wrong, then anything you say is not going to help. Orangemarlin 01:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
A comparison of ImprobabilityDrive logs against logs will show that it is not possible for me to be a sockpuppet of Gnixon, as you were told previously. Again, this is just another false accusation by Orangemarlin who has a history of making false sock puppet accusations, as do others who pre-empt him. Infinite Improbability Drive 02:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comments of Orangemarlin: Previous sockpuppetry charges against you are irrelevant. You made an error in editing, which showed your IP address, which is the same one as VacuousPoet. If we had known, we would have submitted the right checkuser. Our error, which is now corrected. Orangemarlin 19:43, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comments of &#0149;Jim62sch&#0149; : There is no attempt to intimidate anyone here, and as I explained to you previously it is any user's right to request a sock check if he feels it is warranted. Additionally, you are clearly not a new user -- that much is made painfully clear by the sophisticated use of tags, some rather arcane, from the moment you started editing. &#0149;Jim62sch&#0149; 20:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Conclusions