Misplaced Pages

Common utility duct

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jim.henderson (talk | contribs) at 01:31, 12 May 2007 (→Advantages of common utility ducts: Separate cable ducts). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:31, 12 May 2007 by Jim.henderson (talk | contribs) (→Advantages of common utility ducts: Separate cable ducts)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
It has been suggested that this article be merged with utilidor. (Discuss) Proposed since March 2007.

A common utility duct, sometimes called a common utility conduit, is any structure - above, on, or below ground - that carries more than two types of public utility lines. However, the phrase often refers specifically to underground tunnels.

Advantages of common utility ducts

The advantages of such facilities are the reduction of maintenance manholes, one-time relocation, and less excavation and repair, compared to separate cable ducts for each service. One of the greatest advantages is public safety. Common utility ducts prevent downed power lines and other utilities from blocking roads, thus speeding emergency access after major natural disasters like earthquakes, hurricanes, and tsunamis. They also allow rapid access to all utilities, without having to dig access trenches or resort to confused and often inaccurate utility maps.

Examples of common utility ducts

Many examples of common utility ducts are found in Japan, where government officials have sought ways to reduce the catastrophic effects of earthquakes in their tectonically active country. Their use, however, is not limited to that country and there are many examples of such common utility ducts. These include:

See also

References

  1. Taipei Gov Website
  2. MAA Website
  3. BigEmpire.com Website
  4. Yokohama Landmark Building Website
  5. Mitchell, Sandy. "Prince Charles is not your typical radical." National Geographic. May 2006. Accessed online 9/14/06
Categories: