Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jeffrey Vernon Merkey (talk | contribs) at 16:28, 23 May 2007 (→[]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Spoiler-blank

User talk:Hipocrite/devnul

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive1

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive2

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive3

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive4

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive5

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Jun06

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Jul06

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Aug06

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Sep06

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Oct06

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Nov06

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Dec06

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Jan07

User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Feb07

Thank you

You are a gentleman, and I am really glad you have come back. What more need I say? Clio the Muse

Spoilers

Please stop inserting spoilers into the discussion which are not necessary. --87.189.89.215

I suggest that you read the content disclaimer for this website, which is linked, through the General disclaimer, from every single page on Misplaced Pages. And stop editing the body of other people's comments. --Tony Sidaway 15:34, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

I won't start another proxy war here. --87.189.89.215

Serious =

Are you serious? Jaber777 13:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Quite. Hipocrite - «Talk» 13:14, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

From helpanddata.com. The pcitrue is not subject to copyright. I would know. Jaber777 13:25, 17 May 2007 (UTC) The other pictures I personally own. Jaber777 13:25, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

I happen to know the person in question. Jaber777 13:26, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Are you trying to provoke me? Jaber777 13:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

No. I guess it's pretty obvious you are trying to provoke me. I owns most of these pictures, the rest are not subject to copyright. Provoke soeone else.Jaber777 13:31, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

This is very sad. I didn't know people like you existed. Jaber777 13:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

What evidence do you what me to provide? Why are you doing this, man? Jaber777 13:35, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

You have made the following statements:

That you "made" Image:Hjaber.jpg yourself. How did you make it? Where did you get the initial image from? This question holds true for all the other images. Hipocrite - «Talk» 13:40, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

That you knew the "person in question" regarding Image:Generaljaber.jpg. Who are they? How do you know them? Why did you get the image from a website that says the image is copyrighted, and not from the "person in question?" Hipocrite - «Talk» 13:40, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Whatever. I'm not willing argue with someone this low. Sorry for your time. Jaber777 13:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

My comments

You removed my comments here. Dont do so again, SqueakBox 19:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Must have been an edit conflict. I suggest you stay out of this one. Hipocrite - «Talk» 19:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

I thought that was likely. I am just watching, SqueakBox 19:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Image

Whoops, I was confusing you with Cynical (similar type name perhaps) so perhaps I was overreacting on that. My sincere apologies over that, SqueakBox 20:02, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Well try it again. I'll leave it a few hours and really check it and if I dont like it will revert. I was confusing you with another user and so over reacted partly based on that, SqueakBox 20:06, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

OTT

This is completely OTT. I know Jeffrey through these wikipedia pages. Next you'll be telling me to stop editing Daniel Brandt, lol. On a different note your edits to my user talk have gone down well. Which brings up the issue of "why arent we doing this (whatever you did) for all main space talk pages". We saw you and I just recently re marijuana how frustrating the current archiving system is. So please dont call me a Squeaktroll (it wont do you any good anyway) but do continue being helpful and let me know about what you think of this archiving trick you have and the possibility of making it policy. Best wishes (believe it or not), SqueakBox 00:18, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Shunning

I read that you recommended that Akliman Akliman (talk · contribs) be shunned. WP:SHUN. This sounds reasonable under the circumstances, but there are disputes over several articles. How can he both be shunned and the disputes be resolved rather than avoided? Watchdog07 15:01, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

There's no deadline. Tag the article with a "this article is shit" bar, and let it fester till someone else deals with it or he gets reasonable again. Hipocrite - «Talk» 15:04, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, that's an idea. What is the proper syntax/template for such a tag? Watchdog07 15:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Depends what your prob with the article is. What's wrong with it? Hipocrite - «Talk» 15:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Joyce center

I'm not sure what put a bee up your blanket young man, but it is cute that you want me to discuss things with you when you walked away from the mediation about that article. Homefill 15:55, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your input, l0b0t. Hipocrite - «Talk» 15:55, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Long Talk Page

Hi Hip. I came across you in a circuitous way but it seems you don't like overly long talk pages. I have one. Is it possible for you to archive it for me? (excuse the impertinence). I'd like the declarations and stuff at the top to remain and, say, the last five items of discussion. The rest should go to Archive #1 - and I like the date tagging at the end as per your archive; but there isn't enough jaw-jaw on my page to merit monthly updates, so a block would do nicely. If you do a good job I can probably provide you with regular employment! Thanking you in anticipation, (Sarah777 09:09, 19 May 2007 (UTC))

Thanks a million! Brilliant. Regards (Sarah777 12:43, 19 May 2007 (UTC))

Wikistalking

Please refrain from following me from article to article. This is the second article I have edited you have showed up to disrupt my editing. Do you actually read anything before making pronouncements it fails WP:V? It does not appear so. That citiation is from the Salt Lake Tribune, which is a reliable source. Stop following me around na dmaking false statements about content. Thanks. Jeffrey Vernon Merkey 17:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

The link was to an unreliable source. If the citation was to a reliable source, like the salt lake tribune, link to that, not the artcle at some kook's website. I am not stalking you, I'm reading the adminstrators noticeboard, regarding an editor that I consider sometimes disruptive (Gwen Gale), as I am wont to do. Hipocrite - «Talk» 17:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration#Cilo_the_Muse.2C_Hipocrite.2C_Rockpocket.2C_StuRat.2C_Loomis51.2C_A.Z._.26_me_Eptypes

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration#Cilo_the_Muse.2C_Hipocrite.2C_Rockpocket.2C_StuRat.2C_Loomis51.2C_A.Z._.26_me_Eptypes. --Eptypes 23:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• Hey, I dunno if Eptypes is a sock of Loomis -- I'm not too familiar with that drama -- but I can tell you right off Eptypes is a confirmed sock of User:Khunter, User:Goingempty, User:Parker007, User:Shines8, and/or User:Paracit. --jpgordon 00:22, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

May I ask how you know that, and why a sock of these editors would suddenly get involved in this, seemingly unrelated, incident. Rockpocket 00:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

You have to love this edit. Can we do a full blown check user on the named users in that RFAR request? David D. (Talk) 01:06, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Endgame1 seems to explain my query above. Do you think these are all socks of someone else named in the RFAR? Seems unlikely to me. Rockpocket 02:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Seen stranger things. David D. (Talk) 03:06, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, i'm not sure it would be accepted at checkuser, but you could try. Rockpocket 03:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

I was just looking through a couple of their user contributions and I have to admit there is little case to be made. Their seem quite different from the familiar users in ref desk. But why the sudden appearance and overkill RFAR, it makes little sense. Although trolling this ref desk mess would make sense if someone wants to distrupt wikipedia. or si this too much WP:BEANS? Feel free to delete as needed. David D. (Talk) 03:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Clio is back

Thanks to you, Hipocrite, and others like you. You will find a note of explanation on my talk page. My very presence drives them mad. What better reason for being here than that? Love, Clio the Muse 23:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Real

Sorry if this is a duplicate of a duplicate; but I had to ask..are you Stephen King?--The Joke النكتة‎ 04:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

No, I'm the King of the Wiki. Hipocrite - «Talk» 13:48, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Pardon me then ;)--The Joke النكتة‎ 13:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

No worries. Comes from . Hipocrite - «Talk» 14:00, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

I see..and you added a clarification..it would've been nice to see SK contributing around here...nice to meet you as well :)--The Joke النكتة‎ 17:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Query

I wanted to ask you this earlier but that turned out to be during your recent wikibreak. I suspect some people will disagree with me on this, but I believe that with your experience and level-headedness you would make a decent canidate for adminship. What are your opinions on that? >Radiant< 13:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

A flattering offer. I must, respectfully, however, defer, for many reasons. Allow me to ennumerate

1. RFA is a morass for editors who have ever been in a conflict. I have been in lots of conflicts. I will never pass RFA, unless it is restructured, under this account.
2. Adminship is a thankless task.
3. While I would be an excellent admin, I would be an excellent admin in the mold of, say, my wikipedia hero Tony S. The community does not currently want adminstrators who ignore that many rules. If the community changes it's mind about generally doing good acts without regard to the rules, then I might change my mind about wanting to do more good acts.
4. Finally, I am prone to explosions of inordinate wikirage. While I have not exploded with wikirage in approx 3 months, I believe that a 12 month rageless period is a reasonable thing for the community to demand from prospective administrators.

However, thank you again for the offer. I will certainly continue to expand my use of editor-tools in adminship like ways. Given that apparently clueful editors are permitted to close DRV's, I intend to help with the load there over the coming months. Hipocrite - «Talk» 13:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

See also , . Hipocrite - «Talk» 13:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

DRV

Hi,

I believe your close is the correct one -- all of yours today, actually. Since I'm around now, I'll just do it myself. Note that since we have objectors, relisting is proper here.

Best wishes, Xoloz 19:00, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Mountain Meadows Massacre

Please help out with your input, thanks. Gwen Gale 00:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

reverting to be disruptive

Your edits and reversions at this point appear to me to be solely for disruption. Jeffrey Vernon Merkey 16:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)