Misplaced Pages

:Requests for page protection - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KingTee (talk | contribs) at 22:22, 4 June 2007 (→{{la|The Black Wall Street Records}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:22, 4 June 2007 by KingTee (talk | contribs) (→{{la|The Black Wall Street Records}})(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions, Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission, or Misplaced Pages:Random page patrol.
Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Skip to requests for protection
    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit
    this header: view • edit



    Archives

    2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024


    Current requests for protection

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Guus Hiddink (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full Protection. Seems to be a favourite page of a known sock. I suspect he's back again under a different name. Kingjeff 21:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Note: - checkuser time again (which I can't do, to answer your question on my talk page) - Alison ☺ 22:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Bliar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    • Protection Edit warring: page is being recreated and then turned into a redirect again, then recreated again (cool down needed).—greenrd 21:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Alison ☺ 22:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    WWE Vengeance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    • Semi-protection Multiple IP's have been vandalizing the page by adding unosurced matches and other nonsense. Reuqest the protection to last until June 25, the day after the PPV. TJ Spyke 21:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Nottingham Forest F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. This page is seeing constant editing by rival fans entering disparaging remarks and irrelevent comments. Flyingscot 20:25, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Page protected by MastCell. - auburnpilot talk 20:53, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    User talk:70.49.97.189 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

    semi-protect Blocked user vandalizing his talk page. NHRHS2010 20:14, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Alison ☺ 20:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Juventus F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect - The article has been experienced continuous changes related to its head coaching position, with many of the IP users setting Claudio Ranieri as current club boss despite of the fact his appointment will become effective not before July 1 and a football season with a caretaker coach is yet to finish. The article also experienced continuous addings of players who actually never signed for the club, e.g. Vincenzo Iaquinta. --Angelo 20:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Greater Syria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect please see article history. thank you. B.Razzouk 19:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Declined Not enough recent activity. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 19:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Steve Nash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect High level of IP vandalism today. NHRHS2010 19:43, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 19:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Greece (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect - The article has been experiencing high levels of vandalism from IPs. --Tλε Rαnδоm Eδιτоr 18:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for 3 weeks due to vandalism by multiple IPs. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 19:00, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Manga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism within the past 12 hours. A protection period of 24 to 36 hours should be sufficient. --Farix (Talk) 18:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Semi-protected – Steel 19:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Doctor Who (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full protection. Almost every day, somebody adds vulgar or personal garbage (e.g., "Doctor Who is gay", or most recently, "Watch my video."). Ted Watson 18:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Declined, good faith edits being made; vandalism level isn't consistently high. – Steel 19:08, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Red Star Over China (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Someone posted several paragraphs of criticism of Snow's book from Chang & Halliday. The volume was excessive and it ignored the fact that most commentators respect Snow and see his work as useful.

    I tried to be constructive, poiting to controversy about Luding Bridge. This was simply ignored.

    Someone last month removed a small reference to Chang & Halliday. That wasn't me, I was willing to live with that. But really they are not relevant. --GwydionM 17:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    I've just edited this article so I'm not going to make a decision on protection. – Steel 19:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
    User(s) blocked. Riana ⁂ 20:13, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Good Charlotte (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Please take of of protection so i can make changes, there are some very incorrect facts.

    I would like to state them:

    In the band members section, this should read:

    Joel Madden, Lead Vocals Benji Madden, Rhythm Guitar, backing vocals Billy Martin, Lead guitar, keyboard Paul Thomas, Bass guitar Dean Butterworth, Drums

    Declined. This page suffers from a high level of vandalism when it's unprotected, if your change is that minor consider proposing it on the talk page. Failing that, create an account. – Steel 19:12, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    White Dragon (England) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    High levels of vandalism from WDS1/WDS2/WDS3/WhiteDragonSlayer and various other suedo-IP's he's using. Vast amounts of information being deleted, changed without references or citations. Three of the above id's have been banned already. Much abuse coming from 212.139.218.107 / 80.41.15.107 / Bertie Bassett / 82.153.29.85 . This is constant. White43 22:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Current requests for unprotection

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Allison Stokke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) unprotection

    No reason given for protection, no doubt the alleged BLP issues discussed in the recent DRV. But this is now on AfD, where the ability to edit the article as proper sources are found and to respond to issues raised is important. It shoudl be unprotected, or perhaps semi-protected, for the length of the AfD at least. DES 20:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Declined Page was protected less than an hour ago. 2nd, it looks like a sufficient edit war to me. Thirdly, your best bet is to talk to the protecting admin Phil Boswell (talk · contribs) -Royalguard11(Talk·Review Me!) 22:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    {{la|Template:Trivia]] unprotection

    Please unprotect Template:Trivia. It has been protected for two weeks, overhastily IMO, for fear of an edit war. Protecting admin has not responded to request on his talk page to unprotect. The template has been spammed across thousands of articles and needs to be edited to comport with WP:TRIVIA and not with the opinions of a few editors who hate trivia sections, and would prefer to use this template to do an end-run so they don't have to work to gain a consensus over at WP:TRIVIA. Thanks - Tempshill 16:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Not unprotected The fact that is used on well over a thousand pages makes it a very high risk and high visibility template. Once you come up with consensus on a wording use {{editprotected}}. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 17:53, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) unprotection

    An admin who goes by the name of Wwoods protected this page inappropriately in fear of a 3RR vio. I reverted the move of this page for consistency with pages such as Armenian Genocide, and Wwoods did not agree as he thought it was "pov". I invited him to discuss it on the talk page, but he refused to, and kept on blatantly reverting. He only used an edit summary once, which was "rv vandalism", highly inappropriate word usage. My edits were made in good faith, and vandalism is the editing with the sole intent of downgrading the Misplaced Pages, which I did not do. I tried to build consensus, but he wouldn't want to try and come to a constructive solution, and started an edit war. In fear of violating the 3RR, he abused his admin tools to indefprotect the page. Admin tools shouldn't be used for a conflict in which the admin is involved personally; those measures should be left to independent sysops. Also, he chose to template the regulars instead of debating. I request this page to be unprotected so that I can discuss this with the involved editor, and if he continues, he can be blocked for violating the 3RR.
    By the way, please let me resolve this with the editor in question, and not here ;-) SalaSkan 18:25, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Declined. I see no evidence that you tried to build consensus for this; reverting (and protecting) a controversial move of a long-established page was entirely appropriate. – Steel 19:00, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
    Aren't "rv, please discuss.", "don't blatantly revert, discuss instead" and "discuss your edits on the talk page please." sufficient? SalaSkan 20:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
    Go and discuss, then. – Steel 20:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
    Declined again just to make sure the archival bot picks up on this request. --Deskana (talk) 22:16, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    General relativity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) unprotection

    This page was protected by user:Gnangarra due to an edit war with the fringe editor SteakNShake (talk · contribs). These types of disputes are usually resolved by the fringe editor quickly running afoul of various of Misplaced Pages's policies and procedures, and being blocked and/or banned as a result. The page protection is only paralyzing this process, while also preventing useful edits to the article. --EMS | Talk 20:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Declined, - can you discuss this with User:Gnangarra first, please? - Alison ☺ 20:21, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
    He has not responded to my request of earlier today. --EMS | Talk 20:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
    Admins are not at beck and call 24 hours a day, and it hasn't even been 1 day of protection yet. I'm sure you'll get a response tomorrow. -Royalguard11(Talk·Review Me!) 22:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Current requests for significant edits to a protected page

    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Fulfilled/denied requests

    Hamilton College (Scotland) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full protection . This article is about a High School in Hamilton Scotland, Some pupils/ex pupils are constantly defacing the article and using it to launch personal attacks on members of staff. 62.49.81.146 14:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Húsönd 14:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    California governor articles

    full protect - Edit war with Emerson7 (talk · contribs) who is changing political bio articles to remove the succession boxes with no consensus - only governors - only CA governors - and only some of them - making them completely inconsistent with other political articles. WRK (talk) 13:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Now Emerson7 is removing succession boxes from various articles. I've added a thread to WP:ANI (section) to address this one-person crusade to make articles inconsistent. WRK (talk) 13:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
    Declined. Protecting 13 articles because of one or two users is a little unbalanced. If Emerson is continually reinstating disputed changes en masse then blocking him is the better option. – Steel 14:16, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


    Excel Saga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect until the end of the day. 13 vandal edits today on a page aimed at children. DrKiernan 08:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Declined - see WP:NOPRO. Kusma (talk) 09:04, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
    I did. As is obvious from my many edits there. DrKiernan 09:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Shark (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    full protection +expiry 1 week, Full protection: Vandalism, This article is subject to basically non-stop vandalism by both IP and registered users. Haemo 06:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - two tag-vandals now blocked - Alison ☺ 06:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Owen Hargreaves (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full protection - a number of different users are in dispute on how the facts in this article should be written, how the formatting should be, whether there should be flags in templates... I would like full protection to force people to talk rather than edit war, as my attempts to start discussion with people have fallen on deaf ears. robwingfield  05:58, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Fully protected by User:Heimstern - Alison ☺ 06:00, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Soviet occupation of Romania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Request full protection--edit-warring over whether or not to put some "disputed" tags on it has taken up the better part of the last three days and it's getting stupid. K. Lásztocska 04:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Phaedriel - 04:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Valley Forge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection - seems like all the recent edits are IP/new user vandalism and reverts. If it makes a difference in the request, I did some of the reverting. --J Clear 02:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - marginal case, but the article needs a chance - Alison ☺ 03:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
    What?! It got 4 bad edits from a blockable IP. There is no need for protection. Splash - tk 03:04, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
    Like I said, it's marginal. Feel free to undo if you feel it is necessary - I'm not about to wheel-war over it. - Alison ☺ 03:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
    Alright, I'll meet you partway on the assumption that the IP might return with a new address. 36 hours. If it does return after that, then a block is the better-targetted action, as it has much less collateral damage in general. Splash - tk 03:14, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
    Sure. That'll work. Feel free to change it :) - Alison ☺ 03:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Talk:Labrador Retriever (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

    Semi-protection -- Frequent personal attacks on another editor to the article's talk page by a stream of related IP addresses. I believe semi-protection blocks IPs. This will get the message across--possibly short, automatically expiring would be fine, as this may get the IP to engage in discussing the issue. Thank you. KP Botany 02:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - I left a comment on the talk page as to why this had to happen - Alison ☺ 03:00, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Blah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection — Frequent IP vandalism. ∼ {\displaystyle \sim } Lenoxus " * " 01:37, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 4 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Riana ⁂ 02:46, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    User:Sixty Six (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and User talk:Sixty Six (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

    Full protection - userspace of banned user, used until recently to harass myself and Matthew Will 23:41, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

    Declined, since he's banned that should no longer be an issue. – Steel 23:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
    Not by him, but by his friends (check his talk history) Will 00:28, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
    Yes, indeed. No need to provide a free platform for intra-project harassment. Fully protected. Splash - tk 00:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
    Won't it be unprotected as soon as they are deleted? --MichaelLinnear 00:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
    Perhaps, so let's not delete them for a while. Splash - tk 00:33, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Race and ancient Egypt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full protection 2 users are edit warring on the page despite the fact that both of them are undergoing intensive mediation. ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠιмυМ ≈ √∞ 22:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

    Fully protected – Steel 23:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

    Britney Spears discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection Vandalism by IP adresses, they do not even read the talk page and they add fair-use images in the page. Kraft. 22:27, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

    Ascham School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection +expiry 3 days, Semi-protection: Vandalism, Lots of IP vandalism -- BlastOButter42  Hear Speak 20:26, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

    Semi-protected – Steel 23:55, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

    List of 2001: A Space Odyssey trivia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    full protection Full protection: Dispute, User:A Man In Black is unilaterally deleting this article by changing it to a redirect. Though he cites policy, he is not following proper procedure for AFD. He is acting on his own and not acting in accordance with AFD procedure policy. He is now in an edit war with me -- this can not be allowed per policy. This article was created in good faith a year ago in responce to the original source article being marked for splitting on account of it bing too big. The matter has not been discussed in any way. I request the article be fully protected until proper procedure has been followed. --Jason Palpatine 23:43, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

    Fully protected due to edit warring. One thing to note is that AfD is articles for deletion; redirecting is not deletion and AfD is not necessary nor appropriate for that. – Steel 23:54, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
    His action of deleting the entire contents of the article by changing it to a redirect is an act of deletion without going through AFD procedure. But I was requesting it be protected in its pre-redirect article form. Thank-you. --Jason Palpatine 00:14, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


    Frank Lampard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Un Protect people agreed to stop making the fat frank comments on talk page, no vandalism recently, just see how it goes for a bit, if possible? Chaza93 12:45, 3 June 2007 (UTC) And none of the edits made by IP Adresses can be vandalism, they were all trying to help edited by Chaza93 12:53, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

    Note: talk to the protecting admin Alison (talk · contribs) -Royalguard11(Talk·Review Me!) 18:11, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
    Declined, - I unprotected it about two weeks ago and all hell broke out. Protect went back on. We need to leave it for another while until the raft of anon vandals get bored - Alison ☺ 03:05, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    The Black Wall Street Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Un Protect This page was blocked from editing due to vandalism, but there was only one case of vandalism in several weeks. This vandalism that occured was reverted within minutes by another user, yet user:Swatjester decided to block the page. I believe he blocked the page not because there were vandalism attempts though, but due to the user wanting the page to remain how he recently edited. There is no longer a need and never was for this page to be blocked from editing temporary or not. KINGTEE 10:16, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

    Category: