This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 867xx5209 (talk | contribs) at 01:31, 24 June 2007 (→Orphan tags). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:31, 24 June 2007 by 867xx5209 (talk | contribs) (→Orphan tags)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Biography Stub‑class | |||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jing Ulrich article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Orphan tags
- 72.75.70.147 has twice (here & here) added {{orphan}} tags to the article.
I'm not at all sure the tags are needed. — Athaenara ✉ 02:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- Please see the history for Elmer Gertz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and this report that I am still preparing for possible submission to Suspected sock puppets ... these meatpuppets have been creating, and adding "marginally" related material to, articles in order to keep this one (recreated after deletion less than a month ago) from being an "orphan" ... most of "What links here" are references to the previous incarnation of the article, which was a Conflict of interest/Noticeboard incident that resulted in three out of four articles being deleted by AfD, and this one being deleted at the author's request rather that go to AfD ... in hindsight, I guess that I may have violated Do not disrupt Misplaced Pages to illustrate a point with the first tag, but it at least it did bring them out of the woodwork and expose their actions to the scrutiny of others. —72.75.70.147 19:44, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- The issue here 72 is your activity. What POSITIVE contributions have you made to Misplaced Pages recently? Any content added, links improved, writing clarified? I doubt it. You seem to move to a new IP address every week or so - looking for articles to attack. What are you running from by changing to new IP addresses? Is it that Admins have had to block your previous IPs for disruptive behavior? What's the point of obsessing about specific articles? If you have a concern, bring them up in the proper context rather than asking a specific Admin to CSD a piece like the one on CLSA. If you have improvements to make, make them. Otherwise, do something else.
- 867xx5209 01:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC) 01:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)