This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yug (talk | contribs) at 10:32, 26 June 2007 (→Proposed merger). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:32, 26 June 2007 by Yug (talk | contribs) (→Proposed merger)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This template must be substituted. Replace {{Requested move ...}} with {{subst:Requested move ...}}.
Unicode
The Unicode table may be merged with the "basic strokes" table. I have no idea how the cryptic Unicode character names map to the strokes' actual names, but if anyone does, please merge them. dab (ᛏ) 19:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
CDL
A XML based "Character Description Language" building characters from 39 basic strokes: http://www.wenlin.com/cdl (Perhaps the future standard)212.202.70.158 23:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hello, I'm really interesting by this 39 basic strokes but I didn't found the line, can you help me to find the good sentence to read. <PS: sorry for my average English, I'm french> --Yug (talk) 12:11, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- That's fine, I found it : http://www.wenlin.com/cdl/cdl_strokes_2004_05_23.pdf --Yug (talk) 12:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Moved from the Talk:Stroke (Chinese character) page
To avoid confusion. Exploding Boy 21:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone care to create a sample character with which each stroke is given a number? -- Taku 08:30, Mar 9, 2004 (UTC)
Requested move
I propose that this page be moved to Stroke (CJK character). The current title doesn't follow the naming policy: it should be singular, and it should be descriptive. Exploding Boy 21:11, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Proposed merger
I propose that the Stroke order article be merged into this one, since it appears that a fair amount of the information is duplicated. Exploding Boy 21:11, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Stroke order is a far more common term, so if there is a merge, I think that it should go in the opposite direction. Dekimasuよ! 00:44, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Proposition seen. Opinion : allow an user with amateur understanding of the Stroke order and CJK strokes lead this is a mistake. --Yug (talk) 10:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC)