Misplaced Pages

User:Igor "the Otter"

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Igor "the Otter" (talk | contribs) at 15:50, 27 June 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:50, 27 June 2007 by Igor "the Otter" (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I didn't want to write here anything at all, but some "smart" persons vandalized this page two times calling me "suspected sockpuppet", then they userpages disappeared quickly for unknown reason, so it seems to be nesessary to explain something here. I am not sockpuppet, understood? I will not describe all of my interests, just say that in present I am a resident of Ukraine and can describe myself like separatist, anarchist, sexist, and pagan, somebody can call me racist. That means I believe that human races exist, they differ greatly and blood is not water. If this is racism, OK then, I'm racist. But conversating with people I always looking at person first not at origin. Reading some articles here I became partly interested in Holocaust denial. Holocaust - related articles in Misplaced Pages unlike most articles here seem to be very biased against researchers, called by tabloids "Holocaust revisionists" or "Holocaust deniers". Reason of that bias, IMHO is that most admins of English Holocaust-related wikipedian sector are the members of the sect-like trollish group using Misplaced Pages to propagate their POV, they only imitate discussion (those are my impressions after conversations with them). That is very bad for the project, IMHO. Wikipedian Holocaust-related articles aren't even close to neutrality. Anyone can check my words. I've read some holocaust deniers'/revisionists' argumets and find some of them much more impressive then ones of official historians, who's arguments obviously sounds like "everybody know...". What can I say at that? Some commonly known things became suspiciously looking if you take closer look at them.