This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Risker (talk | contribs) at 21:14, 27 June 2007 (→JzG's evidence: fix quote). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:14, 27 June 2007 by Risker (talk | contribs) (→JzG's evidence: fix quote)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Clerks: do we generally allow non-evidence on the evidence page, or do we ask it be removed? There are a lot of statements here that are either interpretations of policy or conclusions of some sort or another. --jpgordon 15:29, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Probably something of a lost cause at this point; and it's not like there's that much actual evidence in this case anyways. ;-) Kirill 15:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
JzG's evidence
I am hoping that JzG means "this policy" in his statement instead of "a policy" here. Blocking IPs of editors for failing to follow MOST policies would indeed be inappropriate - as far as I can tell, this is the only policy that permits blocking of IPs instead of the editors themselves. Risker 21:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)