This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Father Goose (talk | contribs) at 10:18, 8 July 2007 (→Relevance of biographical details: copyedit). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:18, 8 July 2007 by Father Goose (talk | contribs) (→Relevance of biographical details: copyedit)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | The following is a proposed Misplaced Pages policy, guideline, or process. The proposal may still be in development, under discussion, or in the process of gathering consensus for adoption. | Shortcut
|
 | This page in a nutshell: Material in an article should be fundamental to its subject, distinguish it from other subjects, or impact it in some way. |
Within Misplaced Pages, Relevance deals with the relation of an article's content to the article's subject. For guidelines regarding the relevance of articles or subjects as a whole, see Misplaced Pages:Notability. For guidance on the relevance of links to outside websites, see Misplaced Pages:External links.
What is relevance?
Relevance refers to the degree to which information is related to a subject. Some information can be critical to the understanding of a subject; other information may have a more esoteric relation to it.
Misplaced Pages is not a paper encyclopedia, and there is little limit to the amount of information that it can hold. However, the depth of Misplaced Pages's coverage must be balanced against the readability (and verifiability) of its articles. An article that is dense with information that is only tenuously connected to the subject does little to inform the reader about the subject.
Misplaced Pages articles should aim to provide an overview of their subject. Longer articles can offer a comprehensive overview, touching upon many facets of the subject. The longest of articles should be kept under 10,000 words or so to preserve its readability and focus (see article size); additional coverage can be provided via subarticles and links to related subjects. Articles on very general subjects should be written in summary style and only contain information having a very strong connection to the subject. Articles on more specific subjects can go into far greater detail.
Ultimately, the relevance of material in any given Misplaced Pages article is gauged by editors who contribute to that article, or to discussion of it. Where questions of relevance are raised, these editors must work together to achieve a consensus as to what belongs in the article.
A few types of information are felt to fall outside the bounds of Misplaced Pages's mission as an encyclopedia, regardless of where they appear. These types are listed at What Misplaced Pages is not.
The subject of an article
The subject of an article should match the article's title. An article titled Internet should be about the global computer network, not about networking, software, or computers in general. When several concepts share the same name, such as "jet", disambiguation pages or templates should be used. The lead paragraph(s) of an article should further specify the subject through a concise description.
Sometimes an article's content will evolve beyond its original subject. If the new content duplicates other, existing articles, the content should be moved into those articles (if it is not already there). However, if the article's subject continues to be cohesive (if broader), the article can be renamed (via the move tab) and its lead edited to reflect its new subject. It is usually a good idea to propose such moves on the article's talk page first, however.
Establishing relevance
Even if information is true and specific to an article's subject, its relevance to that subject may need to be demonstrated. Relevance can usually be demonstrated by answering one of the following three questions:
- What impact does this information have on the subject of the article?
- Is it a fundamental property?
- Is it a distinguishing trait?
If a convincing argument cannot be presented that a given piece of information answers one of these questions, its relevance is uncertain, and other editors are within their rights to remove it from the article. If the information is relevant to another article, however, an attempt should be made to integrate it into that article.
Relevance to subtopics
Longer articles often cover many aspects of a subject, both fundamental and peripheral. For instance, the article on Earth covers its physical characteristics, geological and biological history, importance to humans, and even the Moon. When such subtopics are within the scope of an article, many facts may be relevant to those subtopics, even if not necessarily relevant to the main subject of the article. However, if coverage of a subtopic is extensive enough to overshadow the main subject (or to digress too far from it), it may be appropriate to split it out into its own article; a short summary of the subtopic and a link to the new article should remain in the original article.
Impact
One way to establish the relevance of a fact is to demonstrate how it has impacted the subject of the article. This impact can take many forms — including, but not limited to:
- Causing the subject to come to public attention (i.e., increasing its notability).
- Changing the subject's form or history (in particular, any of its fundamental or distinguishing traits).
- Changing how the public perceives the subject.
Fundamental information
Ordinary traits that are needed to provide a fundamental description of the article's subject are always relevant. These facts should generally explain what the subject is, what it does (or did), and what it is notable for, and should appear in the lead paragraphs (or in an infobox), or in the first lines of any section to which they are most relevant.
Distinguishing traits
Some traits are not necessarily part of a basic description of the subject, but serve to distinguish it from other, similar subjects. These traits should be unusual for that type of subject, along the lines of "first", "most common", "one of the few", or similar distinctive claims.
Context
Without sufficient context, even some highly-relevant information can seem to have little importance to the subject of the article. This is especially true when disparate facts are grouped together, such as in a "Trivia" list. To improve the formatting and organization of such information, Misplaced Pages:Avoid trivia sections recommends moving it into other sections as prose, adding context where possible. Sometimes a new section (or a new, more tightly-focused list) can be created out of closely-related items. However, even when a given set of information is best organized via a structured list, an introductory paragraph may help convey its significance to the subject.
Connections between subjects
Not every connection between two subjects needs to be mentioned in both, or even either of their articles. Incidental connections between subjects (i.e., with no demonstrable impact on either) do not need to be documented anywhere on Misplaced Pages.
In many cases, a fact that connects two subjects may be important to one of the subjects, but not the other. This is commonly the case with creative works that are based on, or otherwise incorporate, other subjects: while the original subject often has importance to the referring work, only very famous references will register an impact on the original subject. Books, movies, and other works (such as documentaries or biographies) that are specifically about a subject are often relevant to that subject, especially if the work has influenced public perception of the subject in some way.
Sometimes, when an article contains a large section listing connections between its subject and others, an editor may choose to split that section off into a new article. The acceptance of such articles on Misplaced Pages is uncertain; see Misplaced Pages:"In popular culture" articles.
Relevance of biographical details
Biographical subjects deserve special attention. Biographical articles are often not about people, but about what brought those people to the public's attention. In this regard, there may be information that is pertinent to individuals, but not to what makes them of interest. The amount of reliable biographical coverage an individual has received is a good indication of what biographical details Misplaced Pages should include on that individual. Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons specifies additional limitations that should be followed when writing about living indviduals.