User talk:Grandia01 - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Grandia01 (talk | contribs) at 15:58, 9 July 2007 (→Personal attack). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:58, 9 July 2007 by Grandia01 (talk | contribs) (→Personal attack)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

re: From grandia01

hi, can you please prove to me how the st. barnabas bible is a forgery??or is it just plain easy to say something like this from you?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grandia01 (talk • contribs)

From Gospel of Barnabas: "The Gospel is considered by the majority of academics (including Christians and some Muslims) to be late, pseudepigraphical and a pious fraud; however, some academics suggest that it may contain some remnants of an earlier apocryphal work edited to conform to Islam." I'm not sure that language could be any stronger.

Second, please avoid personal attacks (Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks) and conform to the 3RR rule (WP:3RR). Thanks. -Patstuart 10:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Personal attacks

Please see Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -Patstuart 10:17, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

re: in reply to your "proof"

1)no muslim scholar denied the authenticity of the gospel of st. barnabas. 2)just because "some" scholar denied it doesn't mean that what he/she said is 100% right because you still didn't provide any logical stand-alone proof.for example:just because bush said that iraq had wmd's,does that mean that iraq really had wmd's?? 3)who are and what are the histories of these "scholars" that you mentioned??not a single name is given... thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grandia01 (talk • contribs)

First off, please understand, I am not trying to make an enemy out of you. I am trying to explain what I wrote. It is now twice that you have personally attacked me, and more times than that that you have simply been rude. I would appreciate if we could keep this discussion on civil grounds.

To explain, I actually took that quote right from Gospel of Barnabas on Misplaced Pages. That was not my own quote. Someone else wrote it. Secondly, when I called it a quackery in the edit summary, I was mimicking something that someone else had written earlier. So I am certainly not alonen in my position. If something is controversial, it is standard procedure that it is discussed on the talk page before it is added. This happens often; it happened with one of my edits earlier today. Please respect this. Thank you for your patience. -Patstuart 10:30, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Also, I believe that you are slightly mistaken in your facts. You have stated "no muslim scholar denied the authenticity of the gospel of st. barnabas." This is a blanket statement, and I find that highly doubtful. http://www.sacred-texts.com/isl/gbar/index.htm, a non-partisan site, describes the text as solely adopted by Muslims, and completely rejected by western scholarship. Thus, it is not "some scholar" who says it's wrong. If anything, it is most of any scholar who says it wrong, with some notable exceptions in the Muslim world. -Patstuart 10:33, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

If you wish to have a discussion on the talk page, I am certainly prepared to back up my statements with reliable sources.

i ask god to show all of us the right path. - that is my prayer every day. Let us, then, do our part, and pray to listen, rather than speak to be heard (I speak as much for myself as for you). God bless. -Patstuart 10:52, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Ahmedenijad comment

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Misplaced Pages has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. -Patstuart 10:35, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Dear Ahmedenijad, thank you for your advice.i guess i have to learn how to hold my temper.ramadhan mubarak!! :)) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Grandia01 (talk • contribs) .

Signing talk-page messages

As a courtesy for other editors, it is a Misplaced Pages guideline to sign your talk page and user talk page posts. To do so simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments and your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added along with a timestamp. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion).For further info see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. -- Jim Douglas _(contribs) 14:46, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Ozonation

We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Ozonation, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.pure-aqua.com/ozonation.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:Ozonation. Then you should do one of the following:

Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:Ozonation where we can find that note; or
Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ozonation.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Misplaced Pages article layout. For more information, see Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Misplaced Pages. Happy editing! FreplySpang 07:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

re Image:Seldon1.jpg

Why is this image not in the public domain? It looks plenty old enough. But as on your upload you indicated that it was not free, I've deleted it. Herostratus 17:17, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Idea generation tools

This article has been nominated for deletion (or has already been deleted). Don't be discouraged! Many of us have had articles deleted, especially early in our wikicareers. Deletion is not a reflection on your editing but simply the application of our standard rules, particularly WP:NOTABILITY (and WP:BIO for persons, WP:WEB for websites, WP:CORP for companies, WP:MUSIC for bands, and so forth.) Looking forward to your future contributions, Herostratus 05:37, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Removal of your edits from Muhammad

The Gospel of Barnabas is widely considered a forgery. No sources you referenced for commentary on the Didache make mention of Islam or Mohommad. Please stop adding them to the Muhammad article. Frotz661 07:05, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

It should by now be obvious to you that this addition is not accepted by the editors to this article, and will be removed on sight. If you continue with this behavior, you will at some point assuredly be blocked. Until then, you are merely wasting everyone's time, including yours.Proabivouac 21:42, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Islambouli iran.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Islambouli iran.jpg. Misplaced Pages gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Misplaced Pages, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 00:08, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Bahrain king.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bahrain king.JPG. Misplaced Pages gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Misplaced Pages, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Baldwin II of Jerusalem

It appears that your addition is a cut-and-paste off the Columbia Encyclopedia online here. We are not allowed to copy in that fashion, it's considered a copyright violation. Columbia Enc. would need to give explicit permission. Wjhonson 18:46, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment on my Talk page. In general it is fine to quote and cite the source, providing your quote does not make up the majority of the article, and provided your quote does not replicate the entire underlying source. Those are the areas where we get into hot water. So you could quote and cite one sentence say from the Columbia Enc. but if you quote the entire entry that's a no-no. Also if our entire article is simply one big quote, that's a no-no. The best articles have a mixture of direct and indirect quotes, plus summations of other sources all mixed together. See for example Krishnamurti which happens to have a lot of quotes and citations. But again, it has summations. It pulls together many sources into one article. Wjhonson 18:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Disruption on Muhammad

Grandia01, your repeated restoration of tendentious material without discussion and in total contempt of consensus has reached the level of disruption., , Please desist from this unacceptably dysfunctional approach to editting Misplaced Pages.Proabivouac 05:44, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Foretelling of Muhammad in the Bible?

Hello Grandia01 thanks for your polite note. The primary reason is that the material you're entering is considered to be somewhat of a fringe theory on the Muhammad article. This type of material can generally be removed per the undue weight clause of Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view policy. What I would recommend you do is consider creating an article about that idea and write it with well sourced attributable citations. The better sourced the material is (with scholarly sources, etc.) the more likely that it will remain on Misplaced Pages. (→Netscott) 06:46, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

It's certainly novel. I've never seen anything like it before. Any source, if quoted, that refers to the Didache as a Gospel seems a bit suspicious. Perhaps Grandia you could quote and cite the complete section to Talk first so we can see what it is. Wjhonson 07:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Noted, please see the Talk page of Muhammad where I've opened a new discussion on whether the Gospel of Barnabas should not be mentioned in the article somewhere. Wjhonson 07:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Grandia01, sorry you caught me as I'm right in the middle of working on a template. I'm going to be a bit busy with that and then I will go to sleep... so I won't be particpating in that discussion for now. If it is still active later on today I will join in. See you. (→Netscott) 08:33, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Three revert violations

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Muhammad. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -- Avi 07:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

I see no evidence of Grandia engaging in 3RR violations. Avi, please don't be heavy handed when there is no need for it. Thank you. Wjhonson 07:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Muhammad

Hi Grandia01,

We need secondary sources per WP:RS to add that. I remember I have read that somewhere but don't rememeber where. I'll add it as soon as I find it. Cheers, --Aminz 21:10, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Barnabas

Grandia01, I'm reading the thread right now. I'm not at all familiar with the Barnabas story so I need to familiarize myself with it a bit more before I comment but at this point I wouldn't be too inclined to include it. Let me read up on it. (→Netscott) 08:33, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Another editor suggested we move some of the more contentious references to Muhammed into a new article. I would not be opposed to that. As far as the Gospel of Barnabas is concerned I'm a bit ambivalent. I can see the argument that you propose, but I can also see the argument, that from the point-of-view of the Muhammad article, it's a bit tangential. It's a very late work, or at least first attested in a late context. It also has elements that tend to speak perhaps toward a source among non-Trinitarian Christians instead of Muslims. The specific ways in which it speaks of Muhammad might be considered blasphemous by Muslims or heretical perhaps. I think most of this is discussed on the G.O.B. page, perhaps we should leave it there. Wjhonson 23:46, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits to Knights Templar

Thank you for contributing to Misplaced Pages, Grandia01! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Misplaced Pages. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \burbandictionary\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Misplaced Pages. Please read Misplaced Pages's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Misplaced Pages's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Misplaced Pages, please note that inserting spam into Misplaced Pages is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 07:56, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Peter Beter

Hi there. I would suggest thoroughly reading and understanding Misplaced Pages's policy about no original research. Your belief, although you think it is interesting (as you stated), does not belong in Misplaced Pages because it has not been published in any reliable sources.--Dcooper 17:44, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

I would also like to warn you that you are one edit away from violating the three-revert rule.--Dcooper 17:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

I was unable to find sufficient reliable sources about Beter, despite looking at numerous database and sources beyond Google. Maybe you can find some sources, but I don't think there are enough available to support Misplaced Pages having an article on Peter Beter. As such, the article is nominated for deletion. I only found sources that talk about him, in reference to Jonestown. If there were enough sources, I would be willing to help improve the article. It's possible he can be mentioned in that or other articles, provided that suitable sources are given. You can weigh in on the deletion page. Regards. --Aude (talk) 18:52, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi, you removed the article for deletion template from Peter Beter with this , claiming that there is no discussion about the deletion. You can find where it is being discussed here: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Peter Beter. Feel free to contribute to the discussion, and to vote to keep or delete the article.--Dcooper 17:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Peter Beter

I don't know much about the article, I closed the AfD based on the discussion (where no consensus developed). Re sources, yes, in principle you can use audio sources, but it would be better if you can find an online transcript of the recordings and cite that. Also, bear in mind that the article shouldn't rely fully on primary sources from the subject themselves; on Misplaced Pages, independent secondary sources are preferred. See WP:RS and WP:ATT for more information on sourcing. Walton 16:55, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Salam

Will you like to help in improving Including Muhammad Pictures Against wiki-policies using references. Thanking you in anticipation. --- A. L. M. 22:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Top Rank

dear brother we do not need it. It is not a useful information. We do not need a western author support to tell other his contribution to our lifes. Many western authors say him bad but we do not also quote them. Because they are not relavent. We should try to tell history in clear way. :) :) --- A. L. M. 07:47, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

ALM, you are absolutely correct.Proabivouac 03:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Personal attacks (again)

Grandia01, this edit is completely unacceptable. Personal attacks are not allowed on Misplaced Pages; do not make them.
Bear in mind that Misplaced Pages aims to discuss topics from a neutral point of view; this is not the appropriate venue to prove that anyone "is the greatest person who ever lived."
Finally, Misplaced Pages operates on the principle of consensus. Repeating the same edit against consensus, as you did for some time early with the "Gospel of Barnabas" material, and as you are doing now with the Hart quote, is disruptive. Use the talk page to try to obtain consensus (though it seems unlikely that you will) and refrain from personal attacks. Thank you.Proabivouac 03:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Roger-ailes.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Roger-ailes.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Misplaced Pages articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Sunshine Man 16:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Rupert-murdoch.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rupert-murdoch.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 08:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Idea generation tools

A tag has been placed on Idea generation tools, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Misplaced Pages:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Gavin Collins 01:45, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Annapurna-dawn.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Annapurna-dawn.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Annapurna-dawn.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Annapurna-dawn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:49, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Hitler

Grandia, if you don't have that passage then it is not saying anything about Hitler's religious beliefs is it, so what relevance does it have to the article? There is some reason to link Hitler's thought to broad ideas about Indo-European thought, especially as mediated by the German Idealist tradition. These points are discussed in detailed literature on Hitler's religious thought such as the papers published in the Journal of Contemporary History earlier this year and Michael Rissmann book Hitler's Gott (Zurich, 2001). Paul B 16:35, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

You are not making any sense. The Nazis believed that the Aryans originated in Germany, following the ideas of Gustaf Kossinna. They thought that the swastika was a symbol used by the Aryans in their travels, and that it eventually ended up in Iran and India. They did not think it originated there. Actually the more "paganist" of Nazis, such as Himmler and Rosenberg, were much more influenced by Zoroastrianism than Hinduism. The point is that this passage is just confused about the nature of Aryanist religious ideology. Paul B 16:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't have any problem with the BBC article itself. As I say, much of it is copied from what I wrote anyway! It's the interpretation that's at assue. However, this section could probvably be expanded, so I will add material from scholarly sources later. Paul B 17:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Baldwin_II.GIF listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Baldwin_II.GIF, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Honey

Nice addition there about Organic honey. You might want to consider combining that paragraph with the existing paragraph on organic honey. By itself, it seems out of place. The resulting larger section would likely work well as an Organic honey subsection to the Types of honey section or Honey as a product section. Also: I moved the cholesterol-related references you added, and made a comment about them on the talk page. I'd appreciate if you could respond to that. -- Bigwyrm 06:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Personal attack

Grandia01, as you know from previous messages here, Proabivouac|Proabivouac believes you are responsible for a personal attack that was posted on his talk page by an IP address . It is unclear whether you were using that IP address, so I am not taking any action (not even a warning) against you at this time. Instead, I simply remind you that personal attacks are not permitted on Misplaced Pages. If you did put that personal attack on his talk page, please apologize and don't do so again. If you didn't then I am sorry for disrupting your editing and thank you for your attention. Have a good week.--Chaser - T 07:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Unbelievable, Chaser. Does WP:AGF mean we must leave our brains at the door? The IP is as obviously Grandia01 as the day is long. See WP:DUCK.Proabivouac 07:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Chaser didn't leave his brain at the door friend,but you instead.quit crying over this.Grandia01 14:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

"Stop crying…"

"Quit crying…"Proabivouac 15:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

huh,even if i did it,am i going to be stupid enough to mention the same words intentionally or unintentionally??STOP CRYING babeGrandia01 15:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)