Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MarkWood (talk | contribs) at 17:38, 25 July 2007 (→Sockpuppetry). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, MarkWood, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Brisvegas 07:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Mediation @ the John Bowlby article

Hi there! I have taken the mediation case listed here. I have replied on the article's talk page, so if you could reply there with your perspective on this issue that would be great! Hopefully we can work things out. Cheers, Brisvegas 07:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Your comment on my talk page

Please do not leave baseless warnings on my talk page or threaten to leave them. Pointing out a conflict interest is not uncivil and making a contested revert once is just fine. shotwell 19:44, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

The warning is founded in Misplaced Pages policies and practices. Specifically, I direct your attention to the Assume good faith and Civil pages. MarkWood 17:44, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

I see that you've all stopped using the non-existant templates. If you want to link to the wikipedia guidelines on good faith or civility, try ] or ]. I'm only telling you this because you're all making the same exact error. While we're at it, there is nothing wrong with pointing out a conflict of interests. shotwell 22:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Mediation over Advocates for Children in Therapy

You have been listed as an involved party in Advocates for Children in Therapy, and I have accepted the case at Misplaced Pages:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-10-07 Advocates for Children in Therapy. If you can please take a look at the case and let us hear your side, I would appreciate it. Thanks! Nwwaew(My talk page) 13:10, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Formal Mediation

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Attachment Therapy, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Misplaced Pages:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. shotwell 19:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Attachment Therapy. For the Mediation Committee, ^demon This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to open new mediation cases. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Arbitration

I have filed an arbitration request concerning Attachment Therapy and listed you as an involved party. You can provide a statement at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration#Attachment_Therapy. shotwell 11:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Attachment Therapy

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Attachment Therapy. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Attachment Therapy/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Attachment Therapy/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (Talk) 17:55, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry

Your sockpuppets have been blocked indefinitely. Please stick to this account from now on. Picaroon (Talk) 03:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Evidence, please?

I do not have my own connection and use several area public connections, such as my local public library and cafes, etc. Can I see the evidence of my being a "sockpuppet," please?

MarkWood (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= do not have my own connection and use several area public connections, such as my local public library and cafes, etc. Can I see the evidence of my being a "sockpuppet," please? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= do not have my own connection and use several area public connections, such as my local public library and cafes, etc. Can I see the evidence of my being a "sockpuppet," please? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= do not have my own connection and use several area public connections, such as my local public library and cafes, etc. Can I see the evidence of my being a "sockpuppet," please? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

• Requests for unblock