TALK PAGE OF とある白い猫

{{{ovr|

To post a new topic please use this link or the 'new section' between "edit this page" and "history".

White Cat is under fire and is taking a short wikibreak White Cat will be back on Misplaced Pages if and only if the shooting and nuking stops...

Posts

Category:Maps of Kurdistan

Hi, what is the scope of that category? -- Cat 14:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi. In answer to your question I found this earlier today: Kurdistan#Geography. --Timeshifter 15:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Well... Kurdistan is also a wannabe defacto country and lacks any definition of borders. If you google for "Kurdistan map" you'll see what I mean. What falls inside and outside of Kurdistan (or its very existence for that mater) is disputed. So it is a problematic term. Perhaps you may want to categorize the maps as being relevant to the Kurdish people as these maps are always about them (weather its Kurdish homelands or ethnic composition). It would have a definite scope and non-controversial title at the same time. -- Cat 16:08, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

What do you suggest? --Timeshifter 16:18, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

I am uncertain. Maybe something along the lines of Category:Maps related to Kurdish people. You may be able to have a better wording in mind since you deal with such categories in bulk. :) -- Cat 17:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Or maybe along the lines of how the commons is dealing with it. Please see commons:Category:Maps of Kurdistan and commons:Category:Kurdistan. --Timeshifter 17:17, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Thats different. On Commons "Kurdistan" refers to Iraqi Kurdistan. Thats possible as a subcat of "Maps of Iraq" in a non controversial manner. Your edit however made it highly controversial :) -- Cat 17:28, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

I believe that the commons is supposed to use the English wikipedia decisions on naming. In order to avoid repeating all the naming battles. I don't care either way how the Kurdistan maps are categorized. So I linked to the relevant wikipedia and commons categories and articles. I figured I'd let others discuss it first before I changed anything. Maybe you can ask at the various commons talk pages and see what others say. Let me know what you find out. I suggest asking at Category talk:Maps. Also, there is no need to reply on my talk page. Please reply here. I have your talk page watchlisted. --Timeshifter 18:04, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Commons is commons. Commons often use English naming schemes but not always. For instance all plants and animals have Latin names. It may be better for you to post this there, I'll comment after you do. -- Cat 18:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Feel free to copy this there. Please let me know if you do. --Timeshifter 18:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice on my talk page that this thread was copied to Category talk:Maps. --Timeshifter 14:45, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Air related articles

You finally free? :) User talk:White Cat/Archive/2007/05#Air episodes - Juhachi -- Cat 11:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

The situation has completely changed since then I believe. There is in no way that those Air episode articles are going to be made ever again. Those articles all lacked secondary sources, and I now would actively promote their deletion if you were to recreate them. As for the character articles, only the 4 main characters should deserve separate articles per WP:FICT, while the others should be kept in the List of Air characters article.--十八 11:53, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Well, I am not asking about their current situation. I am asking if you are going to help or not. You said you would back then. i see no change in the situation. I have waited this long. -- Cat 12:01, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

And I am saying that it depends on a few things. Yes, I am free, but if you go blatently against policy, then I am not going to help you. We've had our share of differences in the past, and we still disagree on some of the finer points.--十八 12:08, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Please read the discussion we had. Your approach to me is almost hostile. You said yourself you did want Air articles to have the coverage of Kannon (or something like that). -- Cat 12:23, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

And as I said above, the situation has drastically changed, and my opinion is different now. The Kanon episode articles, and the minor characters for Kanon, have all been removed by me per the policies set at WP:EPISODE and WP:FICT. Currently, the Kanon set of articles is nearly identical to the Air set of articles, except Kanon has 6 separate articles for the 6 main characters. Air should also, in my opinion, get 4 separate articles for the 4 main characters, but nothing beyond that. No Air (anime), or Air (manga) articles, or anything else; just those 4 articles. Nothing else has to be made, or can be made realistically without going aganisnt policy.--十八 12:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Those are guidelines, not policies. Will you help or not. Please do not lecture me on policy when I am asking if you will participate in an article improvement drive or not. -- Cat 12:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Actually forget it, this is being far too unpleasant to begin with. -- Cat 13:05, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Dictionaries

How dare you call my contribution spam!!! I am a Kurd and I made a lsit of kurdish dictionaries. you bloody turkish nationalist and atoricity commiting bone breaking Nazi. watch out folk this slimy Turk is trying to censor the internet this is not undemocratic Turkey here, no prison cells in wikipedia you stupid Turk! And you buggers want membership to the EEC—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jopling100 (talk • contribs) 22:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

WP:RFBOT

Your recent bot approvals request has been approved. Please see the request page for details. When the bot flag is set it will show up in this log. Sorry for the delay. —METS501 (talk) 05:50, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Bot flag for WOPR

Hi. Per Mets501's approval , I've granted your bot account a bot flag . Cheers, Redux 13:29, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Yay! -- Cat 13:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for folowing images

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading following images. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description pages and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

1. Image:Superpower2 cover.jpg
2. Image:Stratagem (ENT episode).jpg
3. Image:Storm Front (Part II).jpg
4. These Are the Voyages... (ENT episode).jpg

--BetacommandBot 04:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

RFCU

Are you going to start a request for checkuser case or should I? If it can be proved that those IP addresses were me, then surly it also could prove or disprove if I am a sockpuppet of Diyako or Xebat. --D.Kurdistani 00:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Midsummer Night's Dream (Oh my Goddess! episode)

Would you mind discussing why you moved that? Shakespeare's play is "A Midsummer Night's Dream" not "Midsummer Night's Dream". There is a disambiguation link on top of the page. -- Cat 15:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Are you serious? Read the Talk page -- the vast majority of users who came to that page did so by mistake. Do you really expect that everyone who is searching for the Shakespeare play is required to know that it starts with the word "A" and include that in their search? --Russ (talk) 15:29, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

I am always serious when I post such a thing.

The talk page conversation is most uncivil and even one of the posters was a vandal (which you have reverted). I do not see an adequate discussion to move the page.

Consider a search for "Midsummer Night's Dream", as you can see the first hit is "A Midsummer Night's Dream" and second one is "Midsummer Night's Dream". If people typo and forget to put an 'A' in front of the title the first line they read will show them their mistake to them.

And yes I generally expect people to either use the "search" function or know the exact title in what they are looking for.

-- Cat 16:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Your comment about search results is applicable only if a user chooses the "search" button instead of the "go" button. Be that as it may, I think the issue should be posted at WP:RM to allow a broader discussion, rather than have you and I go back and forth about what makes more sense. --Russ (talk) 16:54, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

As you wish. Though I,d like to add that the "go" button is reserved almost completely for "exact" titles. -- Cat 17:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and just to be clear -- when I said "Are you serious?" I didn't mean were you serious about wanting the page at a particular title, but were you serious about not understanding my reason for moving it. --Russ (talk) 21:23, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Heh, its fine :) -- Cat 21:29, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you very much for the barnstar. It's always nice to see that one's work is appreciated. :) --Hemlock Martinis 04:35, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:RFBOT

Your recent bot approvals request has been speedily approved. Please see the request page for details. When the bot flag is set it will show up in this log. --ST47Talk 12:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Zombie

It has been reanimated, as befitting for the undead. >Radiant< 14:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

What type of animation? :D -- Cat 14:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

You know, the classic type. Heavy slabs, electrodes in the neck, lightning bolt to the chest, that routine. >Radiant< 14:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

No ice cream? (btw what is this about? :)) -- Cat 14:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

the White Zombie band cat. >Radiant< 14:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

OH! How could I miss that! :D -- Cat 14:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Btw, I see you are more active with cfds. I'd like to use my bot to assist you with decategorization and recategorization. :) Is there a central list for this? I would like to work on a particular nom right after you close it making a backlog non-existant. -- Cat 15:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

• WP:CFD/W. Also, WP:BACK. >Radiant< 15:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

...

sono chikara mo watashi ga torikonde kuru... 阿修羅96 21:24, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi, how can I help you? -- Cat 13:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Kurdish historical sites

Hi, I am curious, what makes a historic site "Kurdish"? Can you reference sources for these? -- Cat 11:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Thank you for your question. Every site built by Kurds is Kurdish, and every site built by Turks is Turkish. Brusk u Trishka 11:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

I do not believe it is that simple. We generally sort historic sites by country not ethnicity. What if a site is partially built by Kurdish and Turkish peoples?

Consider Ephesus, it has Ancient Greek and Roman origin. It isn't categorized as a "Greek city" though.

-- Cat 13:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Well. if you look at it again, you will see that it is categorized as a Greek city twice in the article. Brusk u Trishka 13:17, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Ancient Greek refers to an era, Greek (ethnicity) does not. -- Cat 13:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Status of Template:Infobox Military Conflict (4 sided)

Hi. Template:Infobox Military Conflict (4 sided), which you created, is currently unused and seems to have fulfilled the purpose it was created for. If there is no particular reason to retain it, would you mind tagging it for deletion with {{db-author}}? Thanks, Black Falcon 16:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

I can but why? :) It may be used later on. Does it cause a problem? -- Cat 17:18, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Why? Just routine maintenance, I suppose. I encountered the page while randomly browsing through templates and suggested deleting it because it is unused and has been for a while. I also can think of no conflict where there have been four distinct (i.e., not allied) fighting sides. If you think it merits retention, would you please replace the "temporary template" message with some basic documentation (nothing too detailed, but so that someone can know how to use it if the need ever arises). Thanks, Black Falcon 18:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

I have done as you asked. I really think the template may be used for a 4-way conflict. There are plenty of those - mostly allied two sides which can be presented individually with this. -- Cat 21:15, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

OK, thanks. And never mind about the documentation ... I just realised that it's probably almost identical to that for Template:Infobox Military Conflict. Cheers, Black Falcon 21:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

(unindent) Can I see an example of this particular infobox anywhere?--Timeshifter 03:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Template:Oh My Goddess

Why was it deleted? Who requested the merge? Whats going on? :D -- Cat 22:46, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Very sorry about that, Cat. Template histories are merged now. Sr13 03:55, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

No problem at all. :) -- Cat 08:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Iraq operations

There are currently 3 Different lists of Iraq Operations; Iraqi coalition counter-insurgency operations(which is also somewhat POV), a chonological list and an alphabetical list. I have added a lot of operations to the alphabetical listing and have been updating it faithfully but I haven't updated the counter insurgency or the Chonological listing much. Before I do I recommend that we consider other methods. I figured out how to add a column sort function and added it to the Alphabetical listing. I recommend the other 2 articles be merged into the alphabetical listing and then we can rename the alphabetical listing to something more appropriate like Iraq Military Operations since 2003 perhaps. I added a blurb on the discussion page and recommended the merge for the chronological list and the counter insurgency operations page. You seem to do a lot with the Iraq war articles what do you think? --Kumioko 15:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

I merely fixed an ugly looking template. I do not know much about the Iraq war itself aside from the fact that we have a lot of articles on it. We can merge multiple templates yes. Which templates did you have in mind? I would prefer a chronological listing over an alphabetical one. -- Cat 15:22, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Cool Cat/Archive/2006/06 and others

Why should I take the deletion of something in my userspace to the MfD? User:Cool Cat underwent an mfd (closure was reverted 4 times by Ned Scott) and later drv (by Ned Scott). My userspace and how I organize it is completely my thing. I can alter it as I please. I do not even have to maintain archives.

Whats wrong with me reorganizing pages in my userspace? Ned Scott has been repetitively attempting to dictate how I am do organize my userspace.

-- Cat 12:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

What's wrong is that you are causing a large amount of drama (as evidenced by the many ANI threads) over something trivial. You said you want the talk page archives to point to your proper talk page. Fixing these broken redirects is the easiest way of resolving that. You seem to be under the mistaken apprehension that the literal wording of the rules must be applied at all times. >Radiant< 13:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

The "drama" is a product of Ned Scott's reverts of my edits. I am not the cause of the drama, Ned Scott is. I am explictly allowed to request the speedy deletion of anything on my userspace. Please do not recreate them again. -- Cat 13:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

False, because Misplaced Pages is not a bureaucracy. You are mistaking the letter of the rule with the spirit of the rule. Speedy deletion is for deletions that are not controversial; these pages have proven controversial, and hence should not be speedily deleted. >Radiant< 13:31, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Nothing controversial about me reorganizing my userspace, the suggestion is rather strange. Please take it to WP:DR or directly to WP:ARBCOM or else, leave it alone. Thanks. -- Cat 13:41, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

False. As the ANI threads prove, your means of reorganizing things does cause controversy. I'd suggest you quit playing ostrich. >Radiant< 13:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Take it to arbcom or whatever process you feel like. I have no intention of allowing Ned Scott or someone else dictate how I am to organize my userspace. I have no intention of stopping editing my userspace. If my edits to my own userspace is leading to drama, so be it. -- Cat 14:01, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

3RR on User talk:Cool Cat/Archive 2005/08

Please do not make excessive reversions, like you did on User talk:Cool Cat/Archive 2005/08, as that is considered edit warring, and is a bad idea. For relevant policy, see the three revert rule. --ST47Talk·Desk 13:37, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

While 3rr does not cover my userspace, I will do as you ask. -- Cat 13:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

A request

I think the root problem here is that, although I asked you to stop editing your signature, you found a way to continue (changing the links instead of the usernames). Could you please stop doing this? Things will probably get back to normal if you stop editing your signature in archive pages. That's what seems to be annoying so many otherwise fair-minded Wikipedians. It may seem like a small thing, and you may wonder what it has to do with them, but evidently your edits do cause a lot of drama and the drama rebounds on you and not on them. So in your own interests, although it may seem unfair, it is better to stop. --Tony Sidaway 18:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

I am hereby employing m:Right to vanish. I request all content in my userspace, usertalk space on all 3 of my usernames to be deleted. I am done here. -- Cat 18:26, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't see a good reason to delete anything. You can vanish any time you want- just log out and stop editing. Friday (talk) 18:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

I do not care what you think. See: m:Right to vanish -- Cat 18:52, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

I will ask Jimbo Wales if this request isn't met within 24 hours. -- Cat 18:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC)-- Cat 18:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Since there is nothing in the user name change policy that mandates users to redirect their user pages, I do not understand why changing links causes such drama. It is possible that people Cool Cat has prevously alienated are over-reacting? As long as he does not make misleading changes to archive content, is there any real reason to object? Thatcher131 18:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

There isn't. But I have been putting up with this nonsense for quite some time now. After getting rid of Davenbelle and his socks I was able to edit comfortably for a few months. Those were the happiest times of mine. Now other people such as User:Ned Scott is filling in for the role of Davenbelle. I will not bother waisting a full 2 years with this one either. Who know... he probably is a sockpuppet or maybe he isn't - not that it matters. -- Cat 19:54, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh come off it, Cat, I barely interact with you, revert a hand full of edits, and you freak out. It's your own fault, and it has nothing to do with harassment or stalking. -- Ned Scott 05:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

It is my fault that you reverted my edits? Why did you revert my edits? -- Cat 06:42, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Now I'm confused. Do you or do you not want all your userspace pages deleted? I'm in the process of tagging (see below), and currently I'm still in the Cool Cat sub-pages, which are all or mostly redirects. If I continue I'll be tagging every single page, including your userpage, for deletion.

{{db|], formerly ] and ], has asked on ] for all of his user pages to be deleted under ].}}

--Tony Sidaway 19:17, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Please delete User talk:White Cat/Archive and all number links. -- Cat 19:26, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

I'll have them deleted as long as they don't contain any substantive edits (if they're just copies of what's in your talk page history that will probably be okay). --Tony Sidaway 19:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Right. I have ceased monitoring any page on the project so I recommend posting things on my talk page. -- Cat 19:31, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Am I to understand that you don't want User:White Cat itself deleted? If so, in order to comply with your wishes in a clean way I'll probably edit it so as to "subst" any transcluded userspace pages and then delete everything else in your userspace. --Tony Sidaway 19:34, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

My userpage is a work of art. It shall be my "head-stone" on this project; just get archives deleted and I'll be fine with it. Me tagging them myself is considered controversial and disruptive so I ask you to preform this task. -- Cat 19:43, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Okay I've tagged all of your talk page archives with the following notice, and most of them have already been deleted:

{{db-userreq|rationale=], formerly ] and ], has asked on ] for all of his talk archive pages to be deleted under ]. The history of ] already contains every single edit ever made on his user talk page since he started editing in February 2005.}}

--Tony Sidaway 20:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed several of the userboxes were deleted, could they be undeleted? The ribbon pages too. -- Cat 06:50, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

I noticed that Picaroon is taking care of migration. I'll ask him to see about the rest. --Tony Sidaway 08:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh I want nothing to be migrated. Anything that is in use can stay here. I just wanted pages like my archives and history pages deleted. -- Cat 09:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

My sig links can/should stay too :/ -- Cat 12:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Need your expert advise

Hello! I hope you are feeling great. I would like you to view my comments here. Your thoughts on this matter is needed here. --Siva1979 10:37, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Admiral (Star Trek)

Admiral (Star Trek), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Admiral (Star Trek) satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and the Misplaced Pages deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Admiral (Star Trek) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Admiral (Star Trek) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --EEMeltonIV 21:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Vice admiral (Star Trek)

Vice admiral (Star Trek), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Vice admiral (Star Trek) satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and the Misplaced Pages deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Vice admiral (Star Trek) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Vice admiral (Star Trek) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

AfD is at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Admiral (Star Trek). --EEMeltonIV 21:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Rear admiral (Star Trek)

Rear admiral (Star Trek), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Rear admiral (Star Trek) satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and the Misplaced Pages deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Rear admiral (Star Trek) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Rear admiral (Star Trek) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

AfD is at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Admiral (Star Trek). --EEMeltonIV 21:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Commodore (Star Trek)

Commodore (Star Trek), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Commodore (Star Trek) satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and the Misplaced Pages deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Commodore (Star Trek) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Commodore (Star Trek) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

AfD is at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Admiral (Star Trek). --EEMeltonIV 21:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Fleet captain (Star Trek)

Fleet captain (Star Trek), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Fleet captain (Star Trek) satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and the Misplaced Pages deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Fleet captain (Star Trek) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Fleet captain (Star Trek) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

AfD is at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Admiral (Star Trek). --EEMeltonIV 21:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Commander (Star Trek)

Commander (Star Trek), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Commander (Star Trek) satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and the Misplaced Pages deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Commander (Star Trek) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Commander (Star Trek) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

AfD is at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Admiral (Star Trek). --EEMeltonIV 21:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Lieutenant commander (Star Trek)

Lieutenant commander (Star Trek), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Lieutenant commander (Star Trek) satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and the Misplaced Pages deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Lieutenant commander (Star Trek) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Lieutenant commander (Star Trek) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

AfD is at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Admiral (Star Trek). --EEMeltonIV 21:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Lieutenant (Star Trek)

Lieutenant (Star Trek), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Lieutenant (Star Trek) satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and the Misplaced Pages deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Lieutenant (Star Trek) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Lieutenant (Star Trek) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

AfD is at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Admiral (Star Trek). --EEMeltonIV 21:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Lieutenant junior grade (Star Trek)

Lieutenant junior grade (Star Trek), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Lieutenant junior grade (Star Trek) satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and the Misplaced Pages deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Lieutenant junior grade (Star Trek) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Lieutenant junior grade (Star Trek) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

AfD is at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Admiral (Star Trek). --EEMeltonIV 21:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ensign (Star Trek)

Ensign (Star Trek), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Ensign (Star Trek) satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and the Misplaced Pages deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ensign (Star Trek) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Ensign (Star Trek) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

AfD is at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Admiral (Star Trek). --EEMeltonIV 21:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Starfleet officer accession ranks

Starfleet officer accession ranks, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Starfleet officer accession ranks satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and the Misplaced Pages deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Starfleet officer accession ranks and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Starfleet officer accession ranks during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

AfD is at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Admiral (Star Trek). --EEMeltonIV 21:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Starfleet enlisted ranks and insignia

Starfleet enlisted ranks and insignia, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Starfleet enlisted ranks and insignia satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and the Misplaced Pages deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Starfleet enlisted ranks and insignia and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Starfleet enlisted ranks and insignia during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

AfD is at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Admiral (Star Trek). --EEMeltonIV 21:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Calton - Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive275#This is officially pointless

So what avenue would you recommend for this?

Add "#REDIRECT ]" to User:Cool Cat. Presto, done. --Calton | Talk 13:40, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

"Either obey or obey" is not a part of WP:DR. That would not fix my archive redirects. -- Cat 13:56, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Also inter namespace redirects aren't allowed I believe. -- Cat 14:17, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

"Either obey or obey" is not a part of WP:DR - Nor are they dessert toppings or floor waxes -- which is just as much a non sequitor, perhaps even less so, than that bit of handwaving. Hint: objections should be made about things that are actually said instead of making up incoherent nonsense to rail at.

Also inter namespace redirects aren't allowed I believe - "User:OLDNAME to User:NEWNAME" is an inter-namespace redirect? Are you sure you know what "inter" means? --Calton | Talk 14:24, 26 July 2007 (UTC)