Sri Lanka and state terrorism

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Watchdogb (talk | contribs) at 12:53, 29 July 2007 (Undid revision 147803266 by Snowolfd4 (talk)see talk). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 12:53, 29 July 2007 by Watchdogb (talk | contribs) (Undid revision 147803266 by Snowolfd4 (talk)see talk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Various groups and individuals have accused the Sri Lankan government of commiting acts amounting to state terrorism.

Background information

Template:Totally disputed According to Ching-In Moon and Chaesung Chun the origins of the conflict lie in a number of actions by the Sinhalese dominated government, including the 1970 "Sinhala Only Act", the enshrinement of Bhuddism as the foremost religion of the state, and oppression of Tamils and democratic Tamil movements. Additional government acts exacerbated matters:

Because of the Sinhalese army occupation of Jaffna and the state terrorism let loose on the people, hostility began to grow and the emotional division between Sinhalese and Tamils became more acute. A group of highly organized young Tamil militants, first calling themselves the New Tamil Tigers and later the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, emerged in 1976 to confront the government terrorism by bearing arms.

James and Brenda Lutz see both sides in the conflict as resorting to terrorism:

This tension eventually led to the outbreak of violence between the communities, and this violence quickly generated terrorist actions in a variety of situations. Both government forces and Tamil dissidents became perpetrators.

Dr. Daya Somasundaram of the University of Jaffna asserts that the ethnic war in Sri Lanka is "a good example of the modern use of terror on a mass scale". Though "ll parties in the conflict have restored to the use of terror tactics," in his view "in the scale, duration, and sheer numbers of victims, it is the Sri Lankan state that is most guilty of the massive use of terror". According to Somasundaram:

Gradually, state terror became institutionalized into the very laws of the land (Amnesty International, 1996), structures of society and mechanisms of governance. Arbtrary detention, torture, massacres, extrajudicial killins, disappearences, rape, forced displacements, bombings, and shelling became common. The minority Tamil community... experience the brunt of the terror.

From 1985 to 1989, according to Gananath Obeyesekere, Sri Lanka pracised state terror against the Sinhalese majority as well:

The 'time of dread' was roughly 1985-89, when ethnic Sinhala youth took over vast areas of the country and practised enormous atrocities; they were only eliminated by equally dreadful state terror.

Chandrika Kumaratunga, the President of Sri Lanka from 1994 to 2005, has also stated in an in interview with David Frost that at the time that her husband Vijaya Kumaranatunga was assassinated, "Sri Lanka had a killing fields, there was a lot of terror perpetrated by the government itself, state terror."

Response to the post 1983 civil conflict

Involuntary disappearances

Template:Totally disputed The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has complained that in 2006 up to 400 people have been disappeared, 245 of who were detained by the army, with another further 25 by the LTTE. The pro-LTTE Tamil daily Uthayan, which has close links with the LTTE, has called it "state terror".

Backing of paramilitary group

According to the AHRC, the Rome Statute of International Criminal Court identifies

"conscripting or enlisting children under the age of fifteen years into armed forces or groups or using them to participate actively in hostilities" as a war crime.

The agency has accused the allegedly Sri Lankan government backed forces of recruiting children, describing is a "state teror" and has appealed to the international community to refer Sri Lanka to the ICC for investigation into the violations of the Rome Statute.

Targeting of civilians

The AHRC has alleged that, "since the collapse of the Geneva talks of February 2006", the government of Sri Lanka has perpetrated a campaign of state terrorism by targeting LTTE sympathisers and Tamil civilians.

References

Ching-In Moon and Chaesung Chun, "Sovereignty: Dominance of the Westphalian Concept and Implications for Regional Security", in Muthiah Alagappa, Asian Security Order: Instrumental and Normative Features, Stanford University Press, 2003, p. 128. ISBN 080474629X
James M Lutz, Brenda J Lutz, Global Terrorism, Routledge, 2004, p. 216. ISBN 0415700507
Dava Somasunduram, "Short- and Long-Term Effects on the Victims of Terror in Sri Lanka", in Yael Danieli, Danny Brom, Joe Sills, The Trauma Of Terrorism: Sharing Knowledge And Shared Care, An International Handbook, Haworth Press, 2005, p. 216. ISBN 0789027739
Gananath Obeyesekere, "Narratives of the self: Chevalier Peter Dillon's Fijian cannibal adventures", in Barbara Creed, Jeanette Hoorn, Body Trade: captivity, cannibalism and colonialism in the Pacific, Routledge, 2001, p. 100. ISBN 0415938848
BBC Breakfast with Frost Interview: President Chandrika Kumaratunga of Sri Lanka , BBC, October 28, 2001.
http://www.ahrchk.net/statements/mainfile.php/2006statements/729/
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/sep2004/sril-s27.shtml
Perera, Amantha (2006-05-04). "MEDIA-SRI LANKA: Press Left to Fend for Itself". Inter Press Service. Retrieved 2007-07-27. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
http://www.ahrchk.net/ahrc-in-news/mainfile.php/2006ahrcinnews/866/
http://www.achrweb.org/Review/2006/141-06.htm
"Sri Lanka: Terror Vs State Terror". ACHR Weekly Review. Asian Human Rights Commission. 2006-11-15. Retrieved 2007-07-28. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Misplaced Pages