This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mfpantst (talk | contribs) at 21:05, 1 August 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:05, 1 August 2007 by Mfpantst (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Shortcut- ]
- Talk:Great_Commission_Association#RfC_On_Selected_Sections Do the disputed sections make the article too long, or are they being removed for content. 21:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Socionomics#improper_synthesis Does it violate WP:SYN and WP:NOR to cite to Freud (and others who never heard of socionomics) as "support" for a neologism created years later? 00:20, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Brahma_Kumaris_World_Spiritual_University#Inclusion_of_E.Romain.27s_website_as_an_external_link Discussion on whether this website should be included in the article as a reference/external link.* Romain, Eugene (2001). "Report on Child Abuse, Beliefs and Lifestyle within BKWSU". Retrieved 2007-07-28. 12:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:British Centre for Science Education Discussion involving verifiability and suitability of a specific quote.23:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Discussion at WikiProject_Mathematics about removing "Mathematical logicians" from logicians category, et al.
- Ebionites Talk:Ebionites#Religious vegetarianism redux. We are having a recurring argument about undue weight and how to properly apply it. Are we obligated to include the opinions of fringe scholars, and where do we draw the line? Ovadyah 20:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Jan de Bakker. We are having a difference of opinion about the precise meaning of the word "Heretical". I would like to have some input from native speakers of English to clear up the issue, Talk:Jan de Bakker#Heretical. 14:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Vedas trying to add a content that states the presence of the Vedas being probably 5 against the commonly commonly known four.08:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Mathematical logic (Talk:Mathematical logic) -- approaching third revert of User:Trovatore, insisting that Mathematical logic is not logic. 02:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Religious discrimination against Neopagans (Talk:Religious discrimination against Neopagans#Denominations or religions?) is "various neopagan denominations" or "various neopagan religions" more correct? 13:11, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Muhammad: Is the "satanic verses" incident (not the Rushdie book, but the account of heretical verses being added to the Qur'an in Muhammad's day) to be reported as historical fact?14:07, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
- Religious discrimination against Asatruers (Talk:Religious_discrimination_against_Neopagans#Actual_debate_on_split): Should it be split? 18:12, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- Persecution of Asatru (Talk:Persecution of Asatru#Request for Comment: Notability): Is it notable or not? 09:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Involution (philosophy) (talk): Dispute over whether to rename and move the article 14:38, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Infidel#Request_for_Comment:_Infidel_Dictionary_Terms: Dispute over Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages is not a dictionary. Should the article cover a dictionary term or be focused on the ecclesiastical term.--Tigeroo 16:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Brahma_Kumaris_World_Spiritual_University Request for involvment. The Article has become bent out of shape in the last few months by problems which have been documented here. There also seems to be some resistance to making any of the required changes, including so much as tagging the article. See the article talk page. 17:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:John_Bosco#Request_for_comment Dispute about whether a saint used dreams to blackmail others and the use of an Italian language source we can't read. ----evrik 17:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:American Family Association - dispute over whether the organization should be categorized under Category:Censorship, Category:Discrimination, and Category:Homophobia 17:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
One disputed section is Systemic Bias and another is Possible Compromise on Category Debate. 04:45, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Christianity by country#RFC - which sources should be used to establish figures? Should sources which mention if someone believes in a God vs. someone believes in a life force use this as an indication of Christianity? Does the cia.gov world factbook consitute a reliable source in and of itself? etc.
- Ellinais - link to ellinais.com, or ellinais.gr? 04:28, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- talk:Sai Baba of Shirdi dispute about the inclusion of a statement that Shirdi Sai Baba's behavior was sometimes violent uncouth. 21:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Atheism#RFC: There is a disagreement about whether a source is reliable. 19:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Banu Qurayza over addition of material in this section . 18:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Vimana this article seems very bad, many unverified statements 00:44, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Obligations in Freemasonry#Responses to RfC - after surviving two AfDs, there is a contested effort to replace the article with a redirect. 16:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC)