This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ideogram (talk | contribs) at 02:20, 7 August 2007 (→[]: correct). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:20, 7 August 2007 by Ideogram (talk | contribs) (→[]: correct)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)User:Ideogram
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
Ideogram (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
Wang C-H (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
Jehochman 18:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Evidence
- Ideogram is making odd edits to the User:Wang C-H page . Ideogram has also blanked warnings from User talk: Wang C-H. There's no talk between the two at all.
- Wang C-H created User:Wang C-H/navigation templates. . Ideogram later created the exact same thing in his own user space, User:Ideogram/navigation templates.
- In Wang C-H's seventh edit to Misplaced Pages, he copies a chunk of User:Ideogram/common article practices I dislike to his own user page.
- Ideogram has a history of disruption. (See block log.) We see the same sort of disruption from Wang C-H, including improper AfD nomination and then improper removal of AfD tags
- Both users seem to employ a "strike and run" tactic. Abusive motions are filed, and then retracted. Compare these AfD nominations by Wang C-H, and with this arbitration request by Ideogram:
- Both users focus extensively on China and seem to be pushing a pro-People's Republic of China POV by deleting, or reducing the visibility of any negative information or any mention of Taiwan/Republic of China:
- These two users have not corresponded on wiki. The above pattern of editing strongly suggests sock puppetry or meat puppetry, in my opinion. Jehochman 19:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Editing sessions fit together neatly without overlapping. Editing sequences by Wang on Aug 5 - 6 do not overlap editing sequences by Ideogram.
- Comments
Yes, it's my sockpuppet. My understanding was that sockpuppets are tolerated as long as no policy is violated, and I don't see any policy violation cited here. --Ideogram 02:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- Conclusions