Misplaced Pages

Allegations of Saudi Arabian apartheid

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jreferee (talk | contribs) at 01:17, 17 August 2007 (Gender apartheid: Merged section content to Sex_segregation_in_Islam#Saudi_Arabia per closed merge proposal on article talk page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:17, 17 August 2007 by Jreferee (talk | contribs) (Gender apartheid: Merged section content to Sex_segregation_in_Islam#Saudi_Arabia per closed merge proposal on article talk page)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
It has been suggested that this article be merged with Human rights in Saudi Arabia#"Apartheid", Sex segregation in Islam#Saudi Arabia and Status of religious freedom in Saudi Arabia. (Discuss) Proposed since August 2007.
This article contains too many or overly lengthy quotations. Please help summarize the quotations. Consider transferring direct quotations to Wikiquote or excerpts to Wikisource.
The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Template:Allegations of apartheid Allegations of Saudi Arabian apartheid draw an analogy from the policies of apartheid era South Africa to those of Saudi Arabia. Those who use the analogy point to Saudi treatment of women and religious minorities, policies of physical separation between the two groups, and/or allege second-class treatment of these groups in Saudi Arabia.


Religious apartheid

It has been suggested that this article be merged into Status of religious freedom in Saudi Arabia. (Discuss) Proposed since August 2007.

Saudi Arabia's treatment of religious minorities has also been described by both Saudis and non-Saudis as "apartheid" and "religious apartheid".

Testifying before the Congressional Human Rights Caucus on June 4, 2002, in a briefing entitled "Human Rights in Saudi Arabia: The Role of Women"", Ali Al-Ahmed, Director of the Saudi Institute, stated:

Saudi Arabia is a glaring example of religious apartheid. The religious institutions from government clerics to judges, to religious curricula, and all religious instructions in media are restricted to the Wahhabi understanding of Islam, adhered to by less than 40% of the population. The Saudi government communized Islam, through its monopoly of both religious thoughts and practice. Wahhabi Islam is imposed and enforced on all Saudis regardless of their religious orientations. The Wahhabi sect does not tolerate other religious or ideological beliefs, Muslim or not. Religious symbols by Muslims, Christians, Jewish and other believers are all banned. The Saudi embassy in Washington is a living example of religious apartheid. In its 50 years, there has not been a single non-Sunni Muslim diplomat in the embassy. The branch of Imam Mohamed Bin Saud University in Fairfax, Virginia instructs its students that Shia Islam is a Jewish conspiracy.

"Non-Muslim Bypass:" Non- Muslims are barred from Mecca

Amir Taheri quotes a Shi'ite businessman from Dhahran as saying "It is not normal that there are no Shi'ite army officers, ministers, governors, mayors and ambassadors in this kingdom. This form of religious apartheid is as intolerable as was apartheid based on race."

Saudi religious police recently detained Shiite pilgrims participating in the Haj, allegedly calling them "infidels in Mecca "

Until March 1, 2004, the official government website stated that Jews were forbidden from entering the country.

According to Alan Dershowitz, "in Saudi Arabia apartheid is practiced against non-Muslims, with signs indicating that Muslims must go to certain areas and non-Muslims to others." On December 14, 2005, Republican Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and Democrat Representative Shelley Berkley introduced a bill in Congress urging American divestiture from Saudi Arabia, and giving as its rationale (among other things) "Saudi Arabia is a country that practices religious apartheid and continuously subjugates its citizenry, both Muslim and non-Muslim, to a specific interpretation of Islam." Freedom House showed on its website, on a page tiled "Religious apartheid in Saudi Arabia", a picture of a sign showing Muslim-only and non-Muslim roads.

According Saudi policy for tourists, it is not permissible to bring Christian or Jewish religious symbols and books into the kingdom and they are subject to confiscation

Notes

  1. Saudi Institute (2001).
  2. Congressional Human Rights Caucus (2002).
  3. Taheri (2003).
  4. United States Department of State. Saudi Arabia, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2004, February 28, 2005.
  5. Dershowitz (2002).
  6. To express the policy of the United States to ensure the divestiture... 109th CONGRESS, 1st Session, H. R. 4543.
  7. Religious Apartheid in Saudi Arabia, Freedom House website. Retrieved July 11, 2006.

References

Template:Types of Segregation

Categories: