Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Rangerdude

< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by User2004 (talk | contribs) at 04:53, 15 June 2005 (+opening RfC). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 04:53, 15 June 2005 by User2004 (talk | contribs) (+opening RfC)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

In order to remain listed at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute, not different disputes. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: {insert UTC timestamp with ~~~~~}), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 00:58, 26 December 2024 (UTC).

(Rangerdude | talk | contributions)

Statement of the dispute

This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections should not edit here.

This is a case of an editor making personal attacks.

Description

{Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Rangerdude has been making personal attacks. On talk pages and in edit summaries he is calling me a "stalker" and accusing me harassing him. He has not accused me of breaking any Misplaced Pages polices. My edits have never been harassing and I have never made any personal remarks about this editor. In addition, I asked to participate in mediation and he has refused. I simply request the editor to please not make personal comments as part of the editing process. -Willmcw 04:53, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)

Evidence of disputed behavior

(provide diffs and links)

Edit summaries where Rangerdude calls me a "stalker"

(?Robert Jensen's September 11, 2001 articles - Jensen incident was more than just "articles" - involved a widely publicized controversy. Quit making unnecessary and deconstructive stalker edits)
(It's an affiliated project. Some KSEV people write for LST, but not all LST works for KSEV. Nobody likes a stalker.)
(revert stalker edit re: "controversy" - def. n. " A dispute, especially a public one, between sides holding opposing views." - not a POV term)
(revert stalker deletion. Chronically biased is part of station history, add description of LST - edited by Patrick)
(?Personal comments - and stalking is stalking, please stop.)
(Nobody likes a stalker...)
(Revert deletion of legit. material. LST is a major & newsworthy Chronicle critic. Nobody likes a stalker)

Talk pages where Rangerdude calls me a "stalker"

Applicable policies

{list the policies that apply to the disputed conduct}

wikipedia:no personal attacks

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

(sign with ~~~~)

Other users who endorse this summary

(sign with ~~~~)

Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to a vote or endorsement, should be directed to this page's discussion page.