Misplaced Pages

Rosalind Picard

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hrafn (talk | contribs) at 14:04, 20 August 2007 (Moving unsourced material to talkpage, per BLP). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 14:04, 20 August 2007 by Hrafn (talk | contribs) (Moving unsourced material to talkpage, per BLP)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This article may require cleanup to meet Misplaced Pages's quality standards. No cleanup reason has been specified. Please help improve this article if you can. (February 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article contains promotional content. Please help improve it by removing promotional language and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopedic text written from a neutral point of view. (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article needs to be divided into sections. Please help improve the article and read the Manual of Style for guidelines.

Rosalind W. Picard is director of the Affective Computing Research Group at the MIT Media Lab.

Darwin dissenter

Recently, The New York Times reported that Dr. Picard signed the Discovery Institute's anti-evolution petition, "A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism". This petition has been widely used by its sponsor, the Discovery Institute, and their supporters in a national campaign to discredit evolution and mandate the teaching of intelligent design in public schools, and it has it has been the subject of criticism and parody.

Although some of the signatories of the Dissent from Darwinism petition hold doctorates in science and engineering disciplines, only about one quarter of the signers have biological science backgrounds, and at least one signatory has abandoned the list, saying he felt mislead. By comparison, during the four-day drive A Scientific Support For Darwinism And For Public Schools Not To Teach Intelligent Design As Science gathered 7733 signatures of people who were verified to be scientists. During the four days of the petition, it received 20 times as many signatures at a rate 690,000% higher than the Discovery Institute can claim.

References

  1. PrNewsWire Oct, 2005

External links

Categories: