Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hoponpop69 (talk | contribs) at 04:20, 22 August 2007 (→Replaceable fair use Image:HellionPromo.jpg). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Old messages will be archived once read, thanks.

• Archive

Note - Automated bots are not welcome on my talkpage, I consider edits by bots to be spam and will be deleted. Any other form of spamming will be automatically removed from the page too.

F.C. Torinese

Do you have proofs that the club was called F.B.C. Torinese? I've always seen it written as F.C. Torinese. Anyway, if the club was called like that, the article should be moved to F.B.C. Torinese, like in F.B.C. Derthona. CapPixel 08:58, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Not really... the standard in the early days was C.F.C. (cricket and football club), because most of the clubs were founded by Englishmen. On authorized almanacs like Almanacco Panini the club is called "F.C. Torinese" and also in the official Torino F.C. history page. CapPixel 11:27, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I meant if you had found it on official sources like FIGC homepage or Torino F.C.'s one. CapPixel

Eccellenza Sicily

They weren't played at all, that's what the Regional Committee decided later on. Pro Favara was apparently readmitted to Eccellenza, but I'm not sure about this, try to have a look at the Committee's official site for some information concerning the issue. --Angelo 20:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the support

I appreciate the revert you did for me on the "Joseph McCarthy" page. It was nice getting some back-up from someone on the McCarthy article. Thank you. Best regards. Jtpaladin 19:36, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism warning

Hey, I know we've had our disputes but giving User:DCGeist a level four warning is pretty extreme. I know his edits were a bit bizarre, more annoying than vandalism, but not really in need of a level 4 warning. Anyway, I hope that you're okay about the situation, I've advised DCGeist to chill out a bit and get worked up about either one barnstar or more than one barnstars... wow. Regards, The Rambling Man 21:23, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

No, I think the answer here is to just try to chat the situation out with DCGeist and see where to go from there. Issuing a level 4 warning is one step away from asking an admin to block which doesn't seem appropriate here. As far as I can see, DCGeist isn't a vandal, and while he's edited some of your pages, I'd just try to take it in good stead. As you say on your user page, "if something is wrong, Daddy Kindsoul believes it should be removed without pussyfooting around." - so alerting users that have messages when they don't seems to fall into that category. To that end, I know this may seem extreme but can I ask you to remove the "You have new messages" banner? It's annoying (even to me) and some people find it very disruptive. All the best, The Rambling Man 21:33, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

WP:STALK

Li'l DyKy, given your concern with Wikistalking, allow me to point out these three edits to you, which constitute exactly that: , , . As the record clearly demonstrates, you have absolutely no interest in either perfect game or Joseph McCarthy, other than my participation in them. And, of course, your edit in the second of those summaries--"per concensus"--is not only misspelled, it's an obvious lie.

So, as Rambling Man suggests, let's try to get some positivity here. Obviously, we have to begin with you apologizing for instigating the negativity with your stalking and that deceptive edit summary. I'm all ears...—DCGeist 21:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:HellionPromo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HellionPromo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 07:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop removing sources

Continuing this will lead to a block.Hoponpop69 04:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)