Misplaced Pages

User talk:Biggspowd

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Parsnip! (talk | contribs) at 02:12, 24 August 2007 (Revert vandalism). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:12, 24 August 2007 by The Parsnip! (talk | contribs) (Revert vandalism)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Biggspowd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a persistent vandal, I made a slight error as I accidentally put something I intended to put on a message board. This block is very harsh, and I am a good editor, I would appreciate if it could be removed. Thank you in advance.

Decline reason:

Putting this anywhere will get you blocked. And your removal of "anti-smoking slants" aren't stellar either. — Kurykh 02:35, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You put "BOW DOWN TO THE KING, HE IS BACK!@!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" in an article about Triple H. You have a history of vandalism, including a string of blocks as long as my arm. I'll let another admin review it, but I personally wouldn't be inclined to lift it. - Philippe | Talk 02:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
I will, however, reduce the length of the block. It was excessively long (I didn't see that your 1 month block was a mistake, so this was unprogressive). - Philippe | Talk 02:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
That's better, but I want it totally removed, I have various AFDs in progress, and 800 good edits are a lot better than 2 bad edits, I am a good editor. I made a slight mistake. Biggspowd 02:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
You made a series of mistakes. Sorry, I'm as willing as the next guy to offer a second chance... but not a fifth. Three bad edits are a coincidence. Four are a pattern. Five are a habit. Kurykh has declined your unblock and I endorse that. - Philippe | Talk 02:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)


August 2007

You have been blocked for a period of 3 months from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. - Philippe | Talk 02:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Reverting your "good" edits

Let's see, how many temper tantrums does this make in the month of August? How many times are you going to storm off, say "fuck you all", and "retire", only to come back and resume editing? You're blocked for a week and that means you can't edit for a week, including your own talk page. The only thing you're allowed to do when you're blocked is request an unblock, which you've done. Unfortunately, the unblock request was denied. Continuing to edit your talk page is block avoidance, which behavior will get you blocked for increasingly longer periods of time. As for your "anti-smoking slant" edits, it reeks of WP:POINT and WP:SOAP, and most definitely is tendentious editing. I hope you will take this week to reevaluate your strategy. The Parsnip! 13:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

AfDs started by this user

So what happens to them? Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Running gags on Around the Horn is in process right now. Willbyr (talk | contribs) 17:47, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

In theory, they should be judged primarily on their own merits, without giving very much weight to the possible agenda of the editor who flagged them. Baseball Bugs 18:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Block subversion

You still don't seem to get it, so you're being reported for block subversion. The Parsnip! 02:12, 24 August 2007 (UTC)