This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gavin.collins (talk | contribs) at 09:03, 24 August 2007 (Add to WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 09:03, 24 August 2007 by Gavin.collins (talk | contribs) (Add to WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)PERI GmbH
No indication of notability through third-party sources. I was wary about speedying it outright, so seeking opinions of others. SchuminWeb (Talk) 08:08, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Week Keep Can't see any justification for speedy - asserts notability. Seems a reasonably big multinational looking at Google (PERI US, PERI UK, PERI DE etc.), but wether we can get any independent sources is different - I would assume there must be some trade reviews that could be used as references but couldn't see any in a quick search. Agree with the advert tag, and needs a re-write, but it does seem to pass WP:N.Pedro | Chat 08:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- hello hello,
- I am engineer,
- let give you a crash course in companies within the construction industry
- If we were to compare the automotive industry with the construction industry
- Then Ford Motor Company would be as to Automobile, as PERI GmbH as to Formwork.
- I see no reason why this article should be deleted or the article EFCO Corp. (leading american formwork company) If anything maybe this article should be reviewed by a third party. If all construction company articles should be deleted then I call for that all automotive companies are treated in the same way.
- --Lumber Jack second account 08:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions. --Gavin Collins 09:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC)--