Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by El C (talk | contribs) at 21:24, 24 August 2007 (→[]: I have nothing further to add at this time to what I said above). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

— Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

The current local time is: 18:33, 11 January 2025 (GMT)

• .JS
• .CSS
• 1A
• AFC
• DW
• ESP
• ETP
• FAC
• GAC
• MATH
• PC
• PLUSING
• RC
• RM
• TSPACE
• USPACE

Only 52082 articles (0.751%) are featured or good. Make a difference: improve an article!

Horseshite?

LOL! I'd be offended about being called "horseshite" if it was a real word… —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  14:35, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Images

When an image is on Wikimedia Commons, does it automatically appear on Misplaced Pages? Otherwise, how does it appear on Misplaced Pages? Thanks in advance. Ted Ted 17:36, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Spells in Harry potter

It is currently under a deletion review. Therequiembellishere 17:14, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Ninoshima

I noticed on Friday you twice blanked the edits done by a new user, without any explanation other than "trim" and "source it >_>". It would have been reasonable and expected for you to leave a message on User talk:Mijalo, letting him/her know what problems there are with the edits. The edits looked good to me , but only needing a more experienced user to come along and help with formatting and references. In accordance with WP:CITE#Unsourced_material, you should have tagged the article with {{Unreferenced}}, since there was nothing libelous there nor anything harmful/false. You should not have blanked it. Mijalo started editing on Thursday, and we should be grateful that he/she came back the next day to make more edits. Blanking his/her edits is not good. (see biting the newbies) I hope Milajo comes back, despite being treated poorly like this. Regards. --Aude (talk) 14:34, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

admin coaching

WOuld you be willing to be my Admin Coach because I was supposed to be with , but he left before we could start anything. The Placebo Effect 22:42, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

No goal

I reverted your edit to No goal, though I am certain you made the edit in good faith. The content may still yet not belong in the article, though. Please see the Talk Page if you are still interested. --Jaysweet 22:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for the tweak. :) Any guess who I lifted the design from? (Answers must be made off-wiki.) ;) —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  00:06, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Anonimu

Hi. What are you trying to do? El_C 10:47, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Hey, do not revert me. El_C 12:00, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

You are being disruptive now. El_C 12:35, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

If you do anything else that is Anonimu-related, you'll be blocked for disruption. Find something else to do. El_C 12:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Following policy != disruption. Will 12:45, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I view your presence in disputes involving himself as problematic; to the point where, one time, you even supported one of the tens of sockpuppets Bonaparte has unleashed against him, and every step of the way, you have been calling for the most draconian penalties to be imposed against him, trying to find the admins whom you think are most severe, and ignoring the equally disruptive conduct of his opponents. You are out of his dispute, effective immediately. El_C 12:52, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I find his contributions as problematic. I've proven time and time again that he's a POV pusher who won't stop. Besides, the only people who can unilaterally tell me to stop in good-faith disputes are paid employees of the Foundation and ArbCom members. Having a sysop bit does not give you authority. If a consensus of editors requests that I stop, or a specific policy or guideline, then I will stop. Will 13:08, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Feel free to test me, then. El_C 13:10, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Can you point me to a specific policy or guidelines that says that what I'm doing is wrong? Before you say it, WP:STALK doesn't. Will 13:19, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Please do not wordlawyer; you are not allowed to try to get a rise out of him, since its obvious you make no criticism as to the disruption by his opponents at any time, your involvement appear wholly one-sided. El_C 21:14, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Don't dodge my questions. I want you to show me where it says I can't. Will 21:19, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I have nothing further to add at this time to what I said above. El_C 21:24, 24 August 2007 (UTC)