Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tajik - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | Case

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Atabəy (talk | contribs) at 22:52, 29 August 2007 (→[]-7). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:52, 29 August 2007 by Atabəy (talk | contribs) (→[]-7)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Tajik-7

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 03:21, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

He is again editing Safavid dynasty, , , and also inserting tags without explanation . Note that his other sock User:German-Orientalist has been banned for editing the same article from the same IP range, using the same material in the edits.Atabek 03:21, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Here , despite denials, the anon IP pretty much confirmed being Tajik, an experienced though banned contributor. He is also making personal attacks. Atabek 18:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
This is the 50th or 60th time that you accuse others of being socks. This site is the best proof for your extremly disruptive behaviour, and for your general bad faith mentality. I think that there is no other user in Misplaced Pages who has accused so many others of being socks. And just take a look at this site. In all cases, you were proven wrong. And it seems like you have a new friend: User:Rabeenaz. Even if he is not your own sock, he is acting as disruptive as you. He was already on your talk page, asking you for some advice against Tajik. And without any permission, he has vandalized different accounts, taging them as sock accounts of Tajik. Someone should check your relationship with that user. Seems to me that your and his actions are coordinated, and his contributions further confirm my suspecion. 84.58.175.216 19:30, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Here is an earlier conclusion by User:Dmcdevit - . The IPs again trace to Hessen, banned User:Tajik again edits Safavid dynasty in a disruptive manner, and again attacks and even insults Azerbaijani and/or Turkish contributors. Most importantly, a contributor of 2 days old, would be unable to comment like above. Thanks. Atabek 20:57, 29 August 2007 (UTC)



If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tajik}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Tajik-6

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 02:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

The evidence for this one was too difficult for me to ignore. Beh-nam (talk · contribs) has been a bit persistent about getting the blocks of Tajik (talk · contribs) and Tajik-Professor (talk · contribs) overturned, just recently replying to a thread about the matter that began in June. His reply, in my opinion, gives a rather unlikely explanation as to how Tajik and Tajik-Professor are two different people from Germany Beh-nam knows personally. Furthermore, Tajik's and Ben-ham's fields of interests aren't too far away and both characteristically almost never use edit summaries despite being longtime contributors. Additionally, Beh-nam used to be named Tajik-afghan (talk · contribs) (similar username). So, the purpose of this request is two-fold: to confirm (or perhaps de-confirm?) that Tajik and Tajik-Professor are one and the same and to find out whether Beh-nam is also a sockpuppet. -- tariqabjotu 02:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

I've added several sock accounts of banned Tajik (talk · contribs) and want to comment here. I know User:Tajik very well, he was deported from the United States in 2003 to Germnany where he has legal status there. Even in prison he was causing trouble and had to be constantly sent to the hole, which is punishment inside prison. User:Tajik is Qizilbash nationalist from Kabul now living in exhile in Germany, while User:Beh-nam is from Badakhshan Province of Afghanistan now living in exhile in Toronto, Canada. Both of these users are partners in crime here on wikipedia, tag-teaming, using socks, annon IPs, and also sharing each others member names. I'm sure that Anoshirawan is User:Tajik. Tajik and Beh-nam view people from other ethnicity or nations as their enemies that have to be destroyed, washing every article from information that they do not like. I use wikipedia just to search and watch what editors do here.--Rabeenaz 11:44, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 Stale. No way of checking anything against Tajik (talk · contribs) or Tajik-Professor (talk · contribs). --Deskana (apples) 15:59, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Having receieved additional data in private, which I have no reason to dispute, it seems all accounts are Red X Unrelated to each other. --Deskana (apples) 16:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Tajik-5

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 06:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Code letter: B

OnlySpeak (talk · contribs) is an obvious sock account that was created to rv controversial articles. Tajik (talk · contribs) was banned by the arbcom decision: Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/E104421-Tajik#Remedies, and the edits of OnlySpeak are very similar to Tajik. Grandmaster 10:52, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments: Added few more suspected IPs and suspected accounts reverting currently or previously on the same set of pages. Assuming good faith with regards to all contributors listed, just looking for resolution regarding socks. It's becoming increasingly difficult to contribute at all in presence of a massive sock/meatpuppetry on Safavid dynasty and other pages. Atabek 15:06, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Red X Unrelated. The users accounts listed are not related to each other. So no serious enough reason to out anyone's IPs. Voice-of-All 23:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)


Tajik-4

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 06:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Code letter: B

User:Tajik has been banned indefinitely by the admin: and the arbcom case formalized his permanent ban. . User:AlexanderPar was registered at the end of April 2007, and since June 2007 has been engaging in very similar edits and aggressive revert warring , , , , , , more along the lines of claiming non-existent consensus as a reason for reverting or removing references. Just want to clear the suspicions. Thanks. Atabek 06:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)


Red X Unrelated. Voice-of-All 20:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.



If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tajik}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Tajik-3

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 16:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Code letter: B

User:Tajik has been banned indefinitely by the admin: and the arbcom case formalized his permanent ban. Despite that, Tajik is editing Safavid dynasty and other artcles under anonymous IPs and sock accounts. There have been already two previous checkuser cases which caught sockpuppetry.

Can you somehow take care of this, perhaps, another semi-protect would help solve the situation. But then he also appeared here . Atabek 16:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

 Possible. Voice-of-All 21:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)


User:Tajik-2

  • Code letter: B

User:Tajik has been banned indefinitely by the admin: and the arbcom case is on a voting stage to formalize his permanent ban. Despite that, Tajik is editing Safavid dynasty and other artcles under anonymous IPs and sock accounts. Grandmaster 07:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

 Likely. Voice-of-All 20:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

User:Tajik

  • Code letter: B

There is a suspicion that User:Ariana310 is a sock- or meatpuppet of the banned , User:Tajik. These users have a history of editing the same set of pages , . After the ban upon User:Tajik and couple of IP socks thereof, User:Ariana310 now resurfaced on Safavid dynasty page again edit warring , reinserting the same quotes without any discussion on the talk page. Please, check for sanity. Thanks. Atabek 17:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

 Additional information needed need a link to the ArbCom decision, per code letter B. --ST47Talk 18:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Provided the links above to ArbCom and admin decisions. The user is currently banned, so if the letter must be F instead of B, I can change that. Thanks. Atabek 18:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

 Unlikely. Voice-of-All 02:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Tajik

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 12:31, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Code Letter: B

Tajik was recently banned indefinitaly by administrator (Dmcdevit) and is now using his other sock puppets and IPs from his area (which begins with 82.83.....) to make edits. As Tajik stated to Dmcdevit that he was the main person to work on the Qizilbash article, well, checking the history of that article and Mardavich sending welcoming tag to the last IP that editted Qizilbash article is suffient proof that both Tajik and Maldavich are one person. Tajik-Professor is also his sock puppet, using the same 82.83....IPs.Keepter 12:31, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Tajik seems to be unblocked now. Voice-of-All 16:24, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Technically Tajik is banned and was warned by an admin to not edit until a decision is made by the board, that's considered being banned for the moment (Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/E104421-Tajik), at that time Tajik stated he was going on a 1 month vacation, which sounded like a lie something most trouble makers come up with, and probably a way to evade block. Since then he has been using different sock puppets (some his former ones that nobody recognized in the past and some new names like user:Tajik-Professor along with IPs from Amsterdam). He is spreading the same POVs in the same or similar articles, which is the main reason most sock puppeteers end up getting caught by.Keepter 17:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 Clerk note: cut and pasted the above comments from Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Pending. -- lucasbfr 18:03, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Red X Unrelated. Mackensen (talk) 18:13, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

I was about to ask for more info/diffs, but no need now. Voice-of-All 18:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.