Misplaced Pages

User talk:Nyisnotbad/Sandbox

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Nyisnotbad

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ursasapien (talk | contribs) at 05:30, 7 September 2007 (Adding a to do list). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 05:30, 7 September 2007 by Ursasapien (talk | contribs) (Adding a to do list)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

To-do list for User:Nyisnotbad/Sandbox: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2007-09-13


Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
  • Article requests : * Find sources for critics that state Mr. Taheri fabricates articles with the help of Benador Associates.
    • Find sources that point out the ambiguous nature of Mr. Taheri's education.

The process should be:

  1. The community works on the article here in your user space.
  2. Together, we reach consensus/compromise language for the article, keeping in mind the need for proper sourcing, neutral point of view, properly weighting different information, and proper manuscript style.
  3. When consensus is reached, you can announce it on the article's talk page and copy this new language to the new article.

Continued edit warring will get you nowhere and could lead to another block or worse. Let's take the diffs you propose, break them down, and see where we can go from here. We can also discuss the main changes you would like to make to the article.

You will find the article you keep blindly reverting to, here. The first thing I notice is that you keep (perhaps unintentionally) removing the template that tells everybody the article is protected. This does not remove the protection, but may cause some to be confused as to why they can not edit the article. On your talk page, you said you would like to include the following things in the article:

  1. The fact that critics allege, with basis in fact, that Taheri deliberately concocts outright fabrications to discredit Iran, and that these stories are (at least in part) developed in conjunction/cooperation with neo-conservative Israel supporters associated with Benador Associates, who are without question Taheri's primary handlers and promoters.
  2. Questions regarding ambiguities about his educational and professional backround, which render his self-proclaimed title of "Iran expert" suspect.

Item number one is difficult. Critics can alledge that Taheri has a particular motivation and it may be appropriate to include that in a "Criticisms" section. However, the only person that truly knows what motivates Taheri, is Taheri. He could quite easily be "deliberately concocting outright fabrications to discredit Iran" or he could be simply writing about things as he perceives them.

Item number two is more easily accomplished. If you have reliable, verfiable sources that contradict his educational or professional background, you can certainly add this information. I do not think it would be appropriate for the lead, but it could certainly be included in the education and career sections.

In conclusion, I would like to let you know that I, personally, appreciate your efforts here at Misplaced Pages. However, I think you will get a lot farther if you work in your user space, achieve consensus, and then post to the mainspace article, rather than continuing to revert. Ursasapien (talk) 05:22, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Category: